arXiv · 2510.27477
The aftermath of compounds: Investigating Compounds and their Semantic Representations
Abstract
This study investigates how well computational embeddings align with human semantic judgments in the processing of English compound words. We compare static word vectors (GloVe) and contextualized embeddings (BERT) against human ratings of lexeme meaning dominance (LMD) and semantic transparency (ST) drawn from a psycholinguistic dataset. Using measures of association strength (Edinburgh Associative Thesaurus), frequency (BNC), and predictability (LaDEC), we compute embedding-derived LMD and ST metrics and assess their relationships with human judgments via Spearmans correlation and regression analyses. Our results show that BERT embeddings better capture compositional semantics than GloVe, and that predictability ratings are strong predictors of semantic transparency in both human and model data. These findings advance computational psycholinguistics by clarifying the factors that drive compound word processing and offering insights into embedding-based semantic modeling.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Swarang Joshi. 2025-10-31. The aftermath of compounds: Investigating Compounds and their Semantic Representations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.27477
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.