arXiv · 2511.19166
Epistemic Familiarity is Associated With Belief Stability in Large Language Models
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are widely used as information sources, yet small changes in semantic assumptions can destabilize their beliefs. We introduce P-StaT (Perturbation Stability of Truth), a framework for evaluating belief stability under matched semantic perturbations in both representational and behavioral settings. Across 21 LLMs and three domains, we compare perturbations involving familiar Fictional statements against synthetically generated and unfamiliar Synthetic statements. Unfamiliar Synthetic perturbations generally induce greater epistemic instability than familiar Fictional perturbations, with behavioral belief retraction rates frequently exceeding 0.5 (50%). Finally, exploratory clustering analyses reveal recurring themes among retracted statements, including ambiguity, technical terminology, and obscure concepts. These results show that epistemic familiarity is systematically associated with stability under semantic reframing, suggesting that stability-based analyses can complement accuracy-based benchmarks when evaluating LLM robustness and reliability. Code and data are available at https://github.com/samanthadies/P-StaT.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Samantha Dies, Courtney Maynard, Germans Savcisens, Tina Eliassi-Rad. 2025-11-24. Epistemic Familiarity is Associated With Belief Stability in Large Language Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.19166
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.