SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2602.05476

FPT Approximations for Fair Sum of Radii with Outliers and General Norm Objectives

Abstract

The sum of radii problem is a classical clustering problem in which, given a set $X$ of points and an integer $k$, the goal is to place $k$ balls that cover $X$ while minimizing the sum of their radii. Recent work has focused on incorporating modern constraints such as fairness and robustness, motivated by biased and noisy data. We study the fair sum of radii with outliers problem, where the chosen centers must satisfy group-based representation constraints while allowing up to $z$ points to be excluded. We present a $(3+\epsilon)$-approximation algorithm that runs in fixed-parameter tractable time parameterized by $k$. Our framework extends to the more general setting where the objective is a monotone symmetric norm of the radii, achieving a $(3+\epsilon)$-approximation for any fixed norm; this guarantee is tight under Gap-ETH. Moreover, the algorithm is oblivious to the choice of norm: it outputs a small list of candidate solutions such that, for every monotone symmetric norm $f$, the list contains a $(3+\epsilon)$-approximate solution under $f$. Our approach is based on a novel iterative ball-finding framework that uncovers a structural trichotomy in the optimal clustering, enabling us to directly construct fair solutions while handling outliers. Finally, we extend our techniques to the more general fair-range setting, where each group is subject to both lower and upper bounds.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ameet Gadekar. 2026-02-05. FPT Approximations for Fair Sum of Radii with Outliers and General Norm Objectives. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05476

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS