arXiv subjects

Ameet Gadekar

Publications and source records attributed to Ameet Gadekar.

17 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

On the Parameterized Approximability of (Mergeable) Sum of Radii Clustering

The sum of radii problem ($k$-MSR) asks, given a metric space on $n$ points, to place $k$ balls covering all points so as to minimize the sum of their radii. Despite extensive study from the perspectives of approximation and parameterized algorithms, the exact parameterized complexity of the problem and the existence of efficient parameterized approximation schemes remained open. We advance this understanding on both the hardness and algorithmic fronts. We begin by showing that $k$-MSR is $W[2]$-hard parameterized by $k$, thereby pinpointing its location in the $W$-hierarchy. Moreover, via our reduction, we rule out efficient parameterized approximation schemes (EPAS)--that is, $(1+\epsilon)$-approximations running in time $f(k,\epsilon)\cdot \mathrm{poly}(n)$--unless $W[2] = FPT$. Assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis, we further rule out such algorithms running in time $f(k,\epsilon)\cdot n^{o(k)}$, strengthening recent lower bounds for the problem. On the algorithmic side, we study $k$-MSR under the framework of mergeable constraints, which captures a broad class of clustering constraints, including fairness, diversity, and lower bounds. We obtain an FPT $(\frac{8}{3}+\epsilon)$-approximation, improving upon the previous best guarantee of $(4+\epsilon)$. Moreover, given access to a suitable assignment subroutine, we achieve a $(2+\epsilon)$-approximation, matching the best known bound for the unconstrained problem. This, in turn, yields $(2+\epsilon)$ FPT-approximations for several important settings, including $(t,k)$-fair, $(\alpha,\beta)$-fair, $\ell$-diversity, and private clustering.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

FPT Approximations for Fair Sum of Radii with Outliers and General Norm Objectives

The sum of radii problem is a classical clustering problem in which, given a set $X$ of points and an integer $k$, the goal is to place $k$ balls that cover $X$ while minimizing the sum of their radii. Recent work has focused on incorporating modern constraints such as fairness and robustness, motivated by biased and noisy data. We study the fair sum of radii with outliers problem, where the chosen centers must satisfy group-based representation constraints while allowing up to $z$ points to be excluded. We present a $(3+\epsilon)$-approximation algorithm that runs in fixed-parameter tractable time parameterized by $k$. Our framework extends to the more general setting where the objective is a monotone symmetric norm of the radii, achieving a $(3+\epsilon)$-approximation for any fixed norm; this guarantee is tight under Gap-ETH. Moreover, the algorithm is oblivious to the choice of norm: it outputs a small list of candidate solutions such that, for every monotone symmetric norm $f$, the list contains a $(3+\epsilon)$-approximate solution under $f$. Our approach is based on a novel iterative ball-finding framework that uncovers a structural trichotomy in the optimal clustering, enabling us to directly construct fair solutions while handling outliers. Finally, we extend our techniques to the more general fair-range setting, where each group is subject to both lower and upper bounds.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Fair Committee Selection under Ordinal Preferences and Limited Cardinal Information

We study the problem of fair $k$-committee selection under an egalitarian objective. Given $n$ agents partitioned into $m$ groups (\eg, demographic quotas), the goal is to aggregate their preferences to form a committee of size $k$ that guarantees minimum representation from each group while minimizing the maximum \emph{cost} incurred by any agent. We model this setting as the ordinal fair $k$-center problem, where agents are embedded in an unknown metric space, and each agent reports a complete preference ranking (i.e., ordinal information) over all agents, consistent with the underlying distance metric (i.e., cardinal information). The cost incurred by an agent with respect to a committee is defined as its distance to the closest committee member. The quality of an algorithm is evaluated using the notion of distortion, which measures the worst-case ratio between the cost of the committee produced by the algorithm and the cost of an optimal committee, when given complete access to the underlying metric space. When cardinal information is not available, no constant distortion is possible for the ordinal $k$-center problem, even without fairness constraints, when $k\geq 3$ [Burkhardt et.al., AAAI'24]. To overcome this hardness, we allow limited access to cardinal information by querying the metric space. In this setting, our main contribution is a factor-$5$ distortion algorithm that requires only $O(k \log^2 k)$ queries. Along the way, we present an improved factor-$3$ distortion algorithm using $O(k^2)$ queries.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Label-consistent clustering for evolving data

Data analysis often involves an iterative process, where solutions must be continuously refined in response to new data. Typically, as new data becomes available, an existing solution must be updated to incorporate the latest information. In addition to seeking a high-quality solution for the task at hand, it is also crucial to ensure consistency by minimizing drastic changes from previous solutions. Applying this approach across many iterations, ensures that the solution evolves gradually and smoothly. In this paper, we study the above problem in the context of clustering, specifically focusing on the $k$-center problem. More precisely, we study the following problem: Given a set of points $X$, parameters $k$ and $b$, and a prior clustering solution $H$ for $X$, our goal is to compute a new solution $C$ for $X$, consisting of $k$ centers, which minimizes the clustering cost while introducing at most $b$ changes from $H$. We refer to this problem as label-consistent $k$-center, and we propose two constant-factor approximation algorithms for it. We complement our theoretical findings with an experimental evaluation demonstrating the effectiveness of our methods on real-world datasets.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Capacitated Fair-Range Clustering: Hardness and Approximation Algorithms

Capacitated fair-range $k$-clustering generalizes classical $k$-clustering by incorporating both capacity constraints and demographic fairness. In this setting, each facility has a capacity limit and may belong to one or more demographic groups. The task is to select $k$ facilities as centers and assign each client to a center such that: ($a$) no center exceeds its capacity, ($b$) the number of centers selected from each group lies within specified lower and upper bounds (fair-range constraints), and ($c$) the clustering cost (e.g., $k$-median or $k$-means) is minimized. Prior work by Thejaswi et al. (KDD 2022) showed that satisfying fair-range constraints is NP-hard, making the problem inapproximable to any polynomial factor. We strengthen this result by showing that inapproximability persists even when the fair-range constraints are trivially satisfiable, highlighting the intrinsic computational complexity of the clustering task itself. Assuming standard complexity conjectures, we show that no non-trivial approximation is possible without exhaustively enumerating all $k$-subsets of the facility set. Notably, our inapproximability results hold even on tree metrics and when the number of groups is logarithmic in the size of the facility set. In light of these strong inapproximability results, we focus on a more practical setting where the number of groups is constant. In this regime, we design two approximation algorithms: ($i$) a polynomial-time $O(\log k)$- and $O(\log^2 k)$-approximation algorithm for the $k$-median and $k$-means objectives, and ($ii$) a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm parameterized by $k$, achieving $(3+\epsilon)$- and $(9 + \epsilon)$-approximation, respectively. These results match the best-known approximation guarantees for capacitated clustering without fair-range constraints and resolves an open question posed by Zang et al. (NeurIPS 2024).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Clustering under Constraints: Efficient Parameterized Approximation Schemes

We present a unified framework that yields EPASes for constrained $(k,z)$-clustering in metric spaces of bounded (algorithmic) scatter dimension, a notion introduced by Abbasi et al. (FOCS 2023). They showed that several well known metric families, including continuous Euclidean spaces, bounded doubling spaces, planar metrics, and bounded treewidth metrics, have bounded scatter dimension. Subsequently, Bourneuf and Pilipczuk (SODA 2025) proved that this also holds for metrics induced by graphs from any fixed proper minor closed class. Our result, in particular, addresses a major open question of Abbasi et al., whose approach to $k$-clustering in such metrics was inherently limited to \emph{Voronoi-based} objectives, where each point is connected only to its nearest chosen center. As a consequence, we obtain EPASes for several constrained clustering problems, including capacitated and matroid $(k,z)$-clustering, fault tolerant and fair $(k,z)$-clustering, as well as for metrics of bounded highway dimension. In particular, our results on capacitated and fair $k$-Median and $k$-Means provide the first EPASes for these problems across broad families of structured metrics. Previously, such results were known only in continuous Euclidean spaces, due to the works of Cohen-Addad and Li (ICALP 2019) and Bandyapadhyay, Fomin, and Simonov (ICALP 2021; JCSS 2024), respectively. Along the way, we also obtain faster EPASes for uncapacitated $k$-Median and $k$-Means, improving upon the running time of the algorithm by Abbasi et al. (FOCS 2023).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Dimension-Free Parameterized Approximation Schemes for Hybrid Clustering

Hybrid $k$-Clustering is a model of clustering that generalizes two of the most widely studied clustering objectives: $k$-Center and $k$-Median. In this model, given a set of $n$ points $P$, the goal is to find $k$ centers such that the sum of the $r$-distances of each point to its nearest center is minimized. The $r$-distance between two points $p$ and $q$ is defined as $\max\{d(p, q)-r, 0\}$ -- this represents the distance of $p$ to the boundary of the $r$-radius ball around $q$ if $p$ is outside the ball, and $0$ otherwise. This problem was recently introduced by Fomin et al. [APPROX 2024], who designed a $(1+\varepsilon, 1+\varepsilon)$-bicrtieria approximation that runs in time $2^{(kd/\varepsilon)^{O(1)}} \cdot n^{O(1)}$ for inputs in $\mathbb{R}^d$; such a bicriteria solution uses balls of radius $(1+\varepsilon)r$ instead of $r$, and has a cost at most $1+\varepsilon$ times the cost of an optimal solution using balls of radius $r$. In this paper we significantly improve upon this result by designing an approximation algorithm with the same bicriteria guarantee, but with running time that is FPT only in $k$ and $\varepsilon$ -- crucially, removing the exponential dependence on the dimension $d$. This resolves an open question posed in their paper. Our results extend further in several directions. First, our approximation scheme works in a broader class of metric spaces, including doubling spaces, minor-free, and bounded treewidth metrics. Secondly, our techniques yield a similar bicriteria FPT-approximation schemes for other variants of Hybrid $k$-Clustering, e.g., when the objective features the sum of $z$-th power of the $r$-distances. Finally, we also design a coreset for Hybrid $k$-Clustering in doubling spaces, answering another open question from the work of Fomin et al.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Fair Clustering for Data Summarization: Improved Approximation Algorithms and Complexity Insights

Data summarization tasks are often modeled as $k$-clustering problems, where the goal is to choose $k$ data points, called cluster centers, that best represent the dataset by minimizing a clustering objective. A popular objective is to minimize the maximum distance between any data point and its nearest center, which is formalized as the $k$-center problem. While in some applications all data points can be chosen as centers, in the general setting, centers must be chosen from a predefined subset of points, referred as facilities or suppliers; this is known as the $k$-supplier problem. In this work, we focus on fair data summarization modeled as the fair $k$-supplier problem, where data consists of several groups, and a minimum number of centers must be selected from each group while minimizing the $k$-supplier objective. The groups can be disjoint or overlapping, leading to two distinct problem variants each with different computational complexity. We present $3$-approximation algorithms for both variants, improving the previously known factor of $5$. For disjoint groups, our algorithm runs in polynomial time, while for overlapping groups, we present a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm, where the exponential runtime depends only on the number of groups and centers. We show that these approximation factors match the theoretical lower bounds, assuming standard complexity theory conjectures. Finally, using an open-source implementation, we demonstrate the scalability of our algorithms on large synthetic datasets and assess the price of fairness on real-world data, comparing solution quality with and without fairness constraints.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

FPT approximations for Capacitated Sum of Radii and Diameters

The Capacitated Sum of Radii problem involves partitioning a set of points $P$, where each point $p\in P$ has capacity $U_p$, into $k$ clusters that minimize the sum of cluster radii, such that the number of points in the cluster centered at point $p$ is at most $U_p$. We begin by showing that the problem is APX-hard, and that under gap-ETH there is no parameterized approximation scheme (FPT-AS). We then construct a $\approx5.83$-approximation algorithm in FPT time (improving a previous $\approx7.61$ approximation in FPT time). Our results also hold when the objective is a general monotone symmetric norm of radii. We also improve the approximation factors for the uniform capacity case, and for the closely related problem of Capacitated Sum of Diameters.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Diversity-aware clustering: Computational Complexity and Approximation Algorithms

In this work, we study diversity-aware clustering problems where the data points are associated with multiple attributes resulting in intersecting groups. A clustering solution needs to ensure that the number of chosen cluster centers from each group should be within the range defined by a lower and upper bound threshold for each group, while simultaneously minimizing the clustering objective, which can be either $k$-median, $k$-means or $k$-supplier. We study the computational complexity of the proposed problems, offering insights into their NP-hardness, polynomial-time inapproximability, and fixed-parameter intractability. We present parameterized approximation algorithms with approximation ratios $1+ \frac{2}{e} + \epsilon \approx 1.736$, $1+\frac{8}{e} + \epsilon \approx 3.943$, and $5$ for diversity-aware $k$-median, diversity-aware $k$-means and diversity-aware $k$-supplier, respectively. Assuming Gap-ETH, the approximation ratios are tight for the diversity-aware $k$-median and diversity-aware $k$-means problems. Our results imply the same approximation factors for their respective fair variants with disjoint groups -- fair $k$-median, fair $k$-means, and fair $k$-supplier -- with lower bound requirements.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Independent set in $k$-Claw-Free Graphs: Conditional $χ$-boundedness and the Power of LP/SDP Relaxations

This paper studies $k$-claw-free graphs, exploring the connection between an extremal combinatorics question and the power of a convex program in approximating the maximum-weight independent set in this graph class. For the extremal question, we consider the notion, that we call \textit{conditional $χ$-boundedness} of a graph: Given a graph $G$ that is assumed to contain an independent set of a certain (constant) size, we are interested in upper bounding the chromatic number in terms of the clique number of $G$. This question, besides being interesting on its own, has algorithmic implications (which have been relatively neglected in the literature) on the performance of SDP relaxations in estimating the value of maximum-weight independent set. For $k=3$, Chudnovsky and Seymour (JCTB 2010) prove that any $3$-claw-free graph $G$ with an independent set of size three must satisfy $χ(G) \leq 2 ω(G)$. Their result implies a factor $2$-estimation algorithm for the maximum weight independent set via an SDP relaxation (providing the first non-trivial result for maximum-weight independent set in such graphs via a convex relaxation). An obvious open question is whether a similar conditional $χ$-boundedness phenomenon holds for any $k$-claw-free graph. Our main result answers this question negatively. We further present some evidence that our construction could be useful in studying more broadly the power of convex relaxations in the context of approximating maximum weight independent set in $k$-claw free graphs. In particular, we prove a lower bound on families of convex programs that are stronger than known convex relaxations used algorithmically in this context.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2023

Parameterized Approximation for Robust Clustering in Discrete Geometric Spaces

We consider the well-studied Robust $(k, z)$-Clustering problem, which generalizes the classic $k$-Median, $k$-Means, and $k$-Center problems. Given a constant $z\ge 1$, the input to Robust $(k, z)$-Clustering is a set $P$ of $n$ weighted points in a metric space $(M,\delta)$ and a positive integer $k$. Further, each point belongs to one (or more) of the $m$ many different groups $S_1,S_2,\ldots,S_m$. Our goal is to find a set $X$ of $k$ centers such that $\max_{i \in [m]} \sum_{p \in S_i} w(p) \delta(p,X)^z$ is minimized. This problem arises in the domains of robust optimization [Anthony, Goyal, Gupta, Nagarajan, Math. Oper. Res. 2010] and in algorithmic fairness. For polynomial time computation, an approximation factor of $O(\log m/\log\log m)$ is known [Makarychev, Vakilian, COLT $2021$], which is tight under a plausible complexity assumption even in the line metrics. For FPT time, there is a $(3^z+\epsilon)$-approximation algorithm, which is tight under GAP-ETH [Goyal, Jaiswal, Inf. Proc. Letters, 2023]. Motivated by the tight lower bounds for general discrete metrics, we focus on \emph{geometric} spaces such as the (discrete) high-dimensional Euclidean setting and metrics of low doubling dimension, which play an important role in data analysis applications. First, for a universal constant $\eta_0 >0.0006$, we devise a $3^z(1-\eta_{0})$-factor FPT approximation algorithm for discrete high-dimensional Euclidean spaces thereby bypassing the lower bound for general metrics. We complement this result by showing that even the special case of $k$-Center in dimension $\Theta(\log n)$ is $(\sqrt{3/2}- o(1))$-hard to approximate for FPT algorithms. Finally, we complete the FPT approximation landscape by designing an FPT $(1+\epsilon)$-approximation scheme (EPAS) for the metric of sub-logarithmic doubling dimension.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Parameterized Approximation Schemes for Clustering with General Norm Objectives

This paper considers the well-studied algorithmic regime of designing a $(1+ε)$-approximation algorithm for a $k$-clustering problem that runs in time $f(k,ε)poly(n)$ (sometimes called an efficient parameterized approximation scheme or EPAS for short). Notable results of this kind include EPASes in the high-dimensional Euclidean setting for $k$-center [Badŏiu, Har-Peled, Indyk; STOC'02] as well as $k$-median, and $k$-means [Kumar, Sabharwal, Sen; J. ACM 2010]. However, existing EPASes handle only basic objectives (such as $k$-center, $k$-median, and $k$-means) and are tailored to the specific objective and metric space. Our main contribution is a clean and simple EPAS that settles more than ten clustering problems (across multiple well-studied objectives as well as metric spaces) and unifies well-known EPASes. Our algorithm gives EPASes for a large variety of clustering objectives (for example, $k$-means, $k$-center, $k$-median, priority $k$-center, $\ell$-centrum, ordered $k$-median, socially fair $k$-median aka robust $k$-median, or more generally monotone norm $k$-clustering) and metric spaces (for example, continuous high-dimensional Euclidean spaces, metrics of bounded doubling dimension, bounded treewidth metrics, and planar metrics). Key to our approach is a new concept that we call bounded $ε$-scatter dimension--an intrinsic complexity measure of a metric space that is a relaxation of the standard notion of bounded doubling dimension. Our main technical result shows that two conditions are essentially sufficient for our algorithm to yield an EPAS on the input metric $M$ for any clustering objective: (i) The objective is described by a monotone (not necessarily symmetric!) norm, and (ii) the $ε$-scatter dimension of $M$ is upper bounded by a function of $ε$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

On the parameterized complexity of Compact Set Packing

The Set Packing problem is, given a collection of sets $\mathcal{S}$ over a ground set $\mathcal{U}$, to find a maximum collection of sets that are pairwise disjoint. The problem is among the most fundamental NP-hard optimization problems that have been studied extensively in various computational regimes. The focus of this work is on parameterized complexity, Parameterized Set Packing (PSP): Given $r \in {\mathbb N}$, is there a collection $ \mathcal{S}' \subseteq \mathcal{S}: |\mathcal{S}'| = r$ such that the sets in $\mathcal{S}'$ are pairwise disjoint? Unfortunately, the problem is not fixed parameter tractable unless $\mathsf{W[1] = FPT}$, and, in fact, an "enumeration" running time of $|\mathcal{S}|^{Ω(r)}$ is required unless the exponential time hypothesis (ETH) fails. This paper is a quest for tractable instances of Set Packing from parameterized complexity perspectives. We say that the input $(\mathcal{U},\mathcal{S})$ is "compact" if $|\mathcal{U}| = f(r)\cdotΘ(\textsf{poly}( \log |\mathcal{S}|))$, for some $f(r) \ge r$. In the Compact Set Packing problem, we are given a compact instance of PSP. In this direction, we present a "dichotomy" result of PSP: When $|\mathcal{U}| = f(r)\cdot o(\log |\mathcal{S}|)$, PSP is in $\textsf{FPT}$, while for $|\mathcal{U}| = r\cdotΘ(\log (|\mathcal{S}|))$, the problem is $W[1]$-hard; moreover, assuming ETH, Compact PSP does not even admit $|\mathcal{S}|^{o(r/\log r)}$ time algorithm. Although certain results in the literature imply hardness of compact versions of related problems such as Set $r$-Covering and Exact $r$-Covering, these constructions fail to extend to Compact PSP. A novel contribution of our work is the identification and construction of a gadget, which we call Compatible Intersecting Set System pair, that is crucial in obtaining the hardness result for Compact PSP.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2022

Clustering with fair-center representation: parameterized approximation algorithms and heuristics

We study a variant of classical clustering formulations in the context of algorithmic fairness, known as diversity-aware clustering. In this variant we are given a collection of facility subsets, and a solution must contain at least a specified number of facilities from each subset while simultaneously minimizing the clustering objective ($k$-median or $k$-means). We investigate the fixed-parameter tractability of these problems and show several negative hardness and inapproximability results, even when we afford exponential running time with respect to some parameters. Motivated by these results we identify natural parameters of the problem, and present fixed-parameter approximation algorithms with approximation ratios $\big(1 + \frac{2}{e} +ε\big)$ and $\big(1 + \frac{8}{e}+ ε\big)$ for diversity-aware $k$-median and diversity-aware $k$-means respectively, and argue that these ratios are essentially tight assuming the gap-exponential time hypothesis. We also present a simple and more practical bicriteria approximation algorithm with better running time bounds. We finally propose efficient and practical heuristics. We evaluate the scalability and effectiveness of our methods in a wide variety of rigorously conducted experiments, on both real and synthetic data.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2015

On the hardness of learning sparse parities

This work investigates the hardness of computing sparse solutions to systems of linear equations over F_2. Consider the k-EvenSet problem: given a homogeneous system of linear equations over F_2 on n variables, decide if there exists a nonzero solution of Hamming weight at most k (i.e. a k-sparse solution). While there is a simple O(n^{k/2})-time algorithm for it, establishing fixed parameter intractability for k-EvenSet has been a notorious open problem. Towards this goal, we show that unless k-Clique can be solved in n^{o(k)} time, k-EvenSet has no poly(n)2^{o(sqrt{k})} time algorithm and no polynomial time algorithm when k = (log n)^{2+eta} for any eta > 0. Our work also shows that the non-homogeneous generalization of the problem -- which we call k-VectorSum -- is W[1]-hard on instances where the number of equations is O(k log n), improving on previous reductions which produced Omega(n) equations. We also show that for any constant eps > 0, given a system of O(exp(O(k))log n) linear equations, it is W[1]-hard to decide if there is a k-sparse linear form satisfying all the equations or if every function on at most k-variables (k-junta) satisfies at most (1/2 + eps)-fraction of the equations. In the setting of computational learning, this shows hardness of approximate non-proper learning of k-parities. In a similar vein, we use the hardness of k-EvenSet to show that that for any constant d, unless k-Clique can be solved in n^{o(k)} time there is no poly(m, n)2^{o(sqrt{k}) time algorithm to decide whether a given set of m points in F_2^n satisfies: (i) there exists a non-trivial k-sparse homogeneous linear form evaluating to 0 on all the points, or (ii) any non-trivial degree d polynomial P supported on at most k variables evaluates to zero on approx. Pr_{F_2^n}[P(z) = 0] fraction of the points i.e., P is fooled by the set of points.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2015

On learning k-parities with and without noise

We first consider the problem of learning $k$-parities in the on-line mistake-bound model: given a hidden vector $x \in \{0,1\}^n$ with $|x|=k$ and a sequence of "questions" $a_1, a_2, ...\in \{0,1\}^n$, where the algorithm must reply to each question with $< a_i, x> \pmod 2$, what is the best tradeoff between the number of mistakes made by the algorithm and its time complexity? We improve the previous best result of Buhrman et al. by an $\exp(k)$ factor in the time complexity. Second, we consider the problem of learning $k$-parities in the presence of classification noise of rate $η\in (0,1/2)$. A polynomial time algorithm for this problem (when $η> 0$ and $k = ω(1)$) is a longstanding challenge in learning theory. Grigorescu et al. showed an algorithm running in time ${n \choose k/2}^{1 + 4η^2 +o(1)}$. Note that this algorithm inherently requires time ${n \choose k/2}$ even when the noise rate $η$ is polynomially small. We observe that for sufficiently small noise rate, it is possible to break the $n \choose k/2$ barrier. In particular, if for some function $f(n) = ω(1)$ and $α\in [1/2, 1)$, $k = n/f(n)$ and $η= o(f(n)^{- α}/\log n)$, then there is an algorithm for the problem with running time $poly(n)\cdot {n \choose k}^{1-α} \cdot e^{-k/4.01}$.

cs.DS↗