SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2602.14255

A Latency-Aware Framework for Visuomotor Policy Learning on Industrial Robots

Abstract

Industrial robots are increasingly deployed in construction and manufacturing tasks, where the deployment of end-to-end visuomotor policies is challenged by the observation-execution gap induced by observation, inference, and execution latencies. This gap is often significant on industrial robotic arms due to high-level control interfaces and slower closed-loop dynamics, making execution timing a dominant system-level concern. This paper presents a system-level, latency-aware framework for deploying and evaluating visuomotor policies on industrial robotic arms. The framework integrates latency-calibrated multimodal sensing, data synchronization, a unified communication pipeline, and a teleoperation interface for collecting expert demonstrations. Within this framework, we formalize a latency-aware execution strategy that assigns timestamps to policy-predicted action sequences and schedules only temporally feasible actions according to their intended execution time, enabling asynchronous inference and execution without modifying policy architectures or training procedures. We evaluate the framework on a contact-rich assembly task while systematically varying inference latency and compare latency-aware execution against blocking and naive asynchronous baselines using identical policies and sensing modalities. Results show that latency-aware execution preserves smooth motion, compliant contact behavior, and task progression consistent with demonstrations across inference latencies of 100-500 ms. Latency-aware execution maintained task duration and motion smoothness within 13% and 9% of the demonstration reference, respectively, while avoiding the latency-dependent slowdown observed under blocking execution and the large contact-force overshoots produced by naive asynchronous execution.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Daniel Ruan, Salma Mozaffari, Sigrid Adriaenssens, Arash Adel. 2026-02-15. A Latency-Aware Framework for Visuomotor Policy Learning on Industrial Robots. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14255

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO