SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2603.11996

Deterministic Algorithm for Non-monotone Submodular Maximization under Matroid and Knapsack Constraints

Abstract

Submodular maximization constitutes a prominent research topic in combinatorial optimization and theoretical computer science, with extensive applications across diverse domains. While substantial advancements have been achieved in approximation algorithms for submodular maximization, the majority of algorithms yielding high approximation guarantees are randomized. In this work, we investigate deterministic approximation algorithms for maximizing non-monotone submodular functions subject to matroid and knapsack constraints. For the two distinct constraint settings, we propose novel deterministic algorithms grounded in an extended multilinear extension framework. Under matroid constraints, our algorithm achieves an approximation ratio of $(0.385 - \epsilon)$, whereas for knapsack constraints, the proposed algorithm attains an approximation ratio of $(0.367 -\epsilon)$. Both algorithms run in $\mathrm{poly}(n)$ query complexity, where $n$ is the size of the ground set, and improve upon the state-of-the-art deterministic approximation ratios of $(0.367 - \epsilon)$ for matroid constraints and $0.25$ for knapsack constraints.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shengminjie Chen, Yiwei Gao, Kaifeng Lin, Xiaoming Sun, Jialin Zhang. 2026-03-12. Deterministic Algorithm for Non-monotone Submodular Maximization under Matroid and Knapsack Constraints. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11996

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS