SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2603.14994

DP-S4S: Accurate and Scalable Select-Join-Aggregate Query Processing with User-Level Differential Privacy

Abstract

Answering Select-Join-Aggregate queries with DP is a fundamental problem with important applications in various domains. The current SOTA methods ensure user-level DP (i.e., the adversary cannot infer the presence or absence of any given individual user with high confidence) and achieve instance-optimal accuracy on the query results. However, these solutions involve solving expensive optimization programs, which may incur prohibitive computational overhead for large databases. One promising direction to achieve scalability is through sampling, which provides a tunable trade-off between result utility and computational costs. However, applying sampling to differentially private SJA processing is a challenge for two reasons. First, it is unclear what to sample, in order to achieve the best accuracy within a given computational budget. Second, prior solutions were not designed with sampling in mind, and their mathematical tool chains are not sampling-friendly. To our knowledge, the only known solution that applies sampling to private SJA processing is S&E, a recent proposal that (i) samples users and (ii) combines sampling directly with existing solutions to enforce DP. We show that both are suboptimal designs; consequently, even with a relatively high sample rate, the error incurred by S&E can be 10x higher than the underlying DP mechanism without sampling. Motivated by this, we propose Differentially Private Sampling for Scale (DP-S4S), a novel mechanism that addresses the above challenges by (i) sampling aggregation units instead of users, and (ii) laying the mathematical foundation for SJA processing under RDP, which composes more easily with sampling. Further, DP-S4S can answer both scalar and vector SJA queries. Extensive experiments on real data demonstrate that DP-S4S enables scalable SJA processing on large datasets under user-level DP, while maintaining high result utility.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yuan Qiu, Xiaokui Xiao, Yin Yang. 2026-03-16. DP-S4S: Accurate and Scalable Select-Join-Aggregate Query Processing with User-Level Differential Privacy. https://doi.org/10.1145/3802042

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

OmniTable: A Unified Wide-Table System for Petabyte-Scale LLM Data Curation and Exploration

Data curation is a critical bottleneck in industrial-grade LLM development, where petabyte-scale unstructured corpora are scattered across hundreds of physical tables, feature engineering relies on manual, table-centric pipeline orchestration, and data lineage is largely absent. We present OmniTable as an architecture blueprint for a unified wide-table layer built on Logical Unification, Physical Separation, targeting petabyte-scale LLM data curation and exploration. OmniTable makes four contributions: (1) a unified wide-table abstraction that consolidates multi-source heterogeneous data and thousands of derived features under a single logical schema via logical-physical mapping; (2) declarative feature lifecycle management that automates dependency resolution, execution planning, operator fusion, and lineage tracking, replacing manual pipeline orchestration with a "declare-and-execute" paradigm; (3) an adaptive execution engine with autonomous governance that achieves stable PB-scale feature backfill through heterogeneous compute routing (CPU/GPU), adaptive tuning, UDF-level fault tolerance, and automated storage layout optimization; and (4) hybrid-accelerated data exploration combining a global ID index, transparent OLAP offloading, and background materialized views to deliver second-level point lookups and filtered exports exceeding 20 TB/hour. In production, OmniTable manages over 35 PB of training data across web, code, PDF, and SFT domains, reducing the human-in-the-loop curation cycle from approximately 14 days to approximately 2.5 days (5.6x over the pre-OmniTable production workflow), with consistent feature versioning, auditable lineage, and minimal manual intervention.

cs.DB

When Does Low-Bit Quantization Preserve the Decisions of Vector Search?

Low-bit quantization can achieve high recall on some vector representations and fail sharply on others, while average distortion and global rank correlation do not explain the difference. We study quantized vector search at the level of the comparisons consumed by ranking and graph-pruning algorithms. Our first result is a distribution-free decomposition: the probability that a comparison flips is bounded by the probability mass of exact margins near zero plus the tail probability of the calibrated residual. We then account for dependence between residuals that share a query or graph node, and derive covariance-aware second-moment identities and tail bounds under a joint MGF proxy. For a frozen candidate permutation, we prove a deterministic coupling theorem for Vamana neighbour selection: the approximate replay returns the exact neighbour list exactly when all candidate-level pruning actions agree on the frozen exact states. We connect these results to representation geometry through an exact Gaussian oracle, establish a strict correlation gain from a deterministic magnitude bit in an aligned bilinear model, and give a rare-contamination construction showing why marginal Gaussian diagnostics do not imply the required residual tails. When analytical assumptions are unavailable, a held-out block certificate bounds the selective failure risk of a frozen quantized rule. Across learned, classical, and synthetic embeddings, standardized exact margins predict held-out ranking and pruning flip rates substantially better than global rank correlation. The framework applies to coordinate binary codes, RaBitQ, Lucene BBQ, and product quantizers through a common decision interface.

cs.DB

Contextual Utility of Quantization Moves in Extreme Low-Bit LLMs

Post-training quantizers select finite code changes using reconstruction proxies or local loss approximations, but the utility of a quantization move depends on the state through which it is executed. We identify two sources of this contextual dependence. First, the displacement of the move matters: evaluating the gradient at the move midpoint captures curvature accumulated along the move that a current-state linearization omits. Across frozen two-bit moves from Llama-3.2 models, midpoint evaluation predicts the direction of exact endpoint loss changes substantially more accurately than current-state gradients. Second, moves interact: exhaustive lattices of legal quantized states are well approximated by quadratic pseudo-Boolean functions, yet their small pairwise components can determine Pareto fronts and cause different evaluation functionals to prefer opposite directions. These effects explain failures of reconstruction-optimal code re-selection and additive composition. Reading each move at its own midpoint repairs the local selection step and improves downstream accuracy and held-out perplexity, while larger supports require evaluating exact endpoints from the state actually reached. Exact-endpoint beam search finds sparse changes that dominate much larger one-shot updates, and repricing the same moves after intervening changes produces widespread sign reversals. These results show that quantization utility is contextual at the granularity of a few moves: reliable construction must evaluate finite changes along their own paths and compose them from the evolving quantized state.

cs.DB