Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2603.22240

A Dividing Line for Structural Kernelization of Component Order Connectivity via Distance to Bounded Pathwidth

Jakob Greilhuber·Roohani Sharma
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this work we study a classic generalization of the Vertex Cover (VC) problem, called the Component Order Connectivity (COC) problem. In COC, given an undirected graph $G$, integers $d \geq 1$ and $k$, the goal is to determine if there is a set of at most $k$ vertices whose deletion results in a graph where each connected component has at most $d$ vertices. When $d=1$, this is exactly VC. This work is inspired by polynomial kernelization results with respect to structural parameters for VC. On one hand, Jansen & Bodlaender [TOCS 2013] show that VC admits a polynomial kernel when the parameter is the distance to treewidth-$1$ graphs, on the other hand Cygan, Lokshtanov, Pilipczuk, Pilipczuk & Saurabh [TOCS 2014] showed that VC does not admit a polynomial kernel when the parameter is distance to treewidth-$2$ graphs. Greilhuber & Sharma [IPEC 2024] showed that, for any $d \geq 2$, $d$-COC cannot admit a polynomial kernel when the parameter is distance to a forest of pathwidth $2$. Here, $d$-COC is the same as COC only that $d$ is a fixed constant not part of the input. We complement this result and show that like for the VC problem where distance to treewidth-$1$ graphs versus distance to treewidth-$2$ graphs is the dividing line between structural parameterizations that allow and respectively disallow polynomial kernelization, for COC this dividing line happens between distance to pathwidth-$1$ graphs and distance to pathwidth-$2$ graphs. The main technical result of this work is that COC admits a polynomial kernel parameterized by distance to pathwidth-$1$ graphs plus $d$.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.CC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jakob Greilhuber, Roohani Sharma. 2026-03-23. A Dividing Line for Structural Kernelization of Component Order Connectivity via Distance to Bounded Pathwidth. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22240

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗