arXiv subjects

Roohani Sharma

Publications and source records attributed to Roohani Sharma.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Multiway $f$-Cut is fixed-parameter tractable

A connectivity function on a finite set $E$ is a function $f\colon 2^E\to\mathbb Z$ that is submodular and symmetric, with $f(\varnothing)=0$. Given a connectivity function $f$ via a value oracle, terminals $t_1,\ldots,t_r\in E$, and an integer $k$, the Multiway $f$-Cut problem asks whether $E$ has a partition $(P_1,\ldots,P_r)$ with $t_i\in P_i$ for every $i$ and $\sum_{i=1}^r f(P_i)\le k$. We prove that Multiway $f$-Cut is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by $k$. Cut functions of graphs are connectivity functions, so as a special case we recover the classical result that Edge Multiway Cut in graphs is fixed-parameter tractable. Our proof of correctness is completely elementary, and is arguably the simplest known proof of this fact.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2026

Where Treewidth and Pathwidth Diverge: Towards a Uniform Kernel for Pathwidth-$η$ Deletion

For a constant $η\geq 0$, Pathwidth-$η$ Deletion is the problem of deciding whether, for a given graph $G$ and integer $k$, there is a set $S \subseteq V(G)$ of size at most $k$ such that the pathwidth of $G - S$ is at most $η$. The problems Treewidth-$η$ Deletion and Treedepth-$η$ Deletion are defined similarly for the parameters treewidth and treedepth, respectively. A landmark result of Fomin et al. [FOCS, 2012] shows that, for any constant $η$, all three problems admit a kernel on $O(k^{c(η)})$ vertices, where $c(η)$ is a constant depending on $η$. Giannopoulou et al. [ACM TALG, 2017] show that, in some sense, this result is optimal for Treewidth-$η$ Deletion: for $η\geq 2$ and even when parameterizing by the size of a vertex cover $M$ of the input graph, there is no kernel of size $O(|M|^{\frac{η+1}{2}-\varepsilon})$, for any $\varepsilon > 0$. Contrasting this result, they prove that Treedepth-$η$ Deletion admits a uniform polynomial kernel, that is, a kernel of size $O(k^c)$ for a constant $c$ that is independent of $η$. In comparison, the question whether Pathwidth-$η$ Deletion admits a uniform polynomial kernel has been neglected in the literature. As treewidth and pathwidth tend to behave similarly, it is natural to expect that no uniform kernel exists when parameterizing by the size of a vertex cover. Surprisingly, we show this not to be the case. More concretely, we prove the existence of a uniform polynomial kernel for Pathwidth-$η$ Deletion when parameterizing by (1) the solution size $k$ plus the size of a set $M$ such that $G - M$ has bounded treedepth; (2) the (vertex-deletion) distance to pathwidth-$1$ graphs; (3) the distance to the class of graphs with treedepth at most $η+ 1$. This leads us to conjecture that Pathwidth-$η$ Deletion admits a uniform kernel when parameterizing by the solution size $k$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Reducing CMSO to Unbreakable Graphs Cannot be Computable

Lokshtanov, Ramanujan, Saurabh, and Zehavi [ICALP 2018] proved that for any CMSO formula $ϕ$, testing $ϕ$ on arbitrary graphs can be reduced to testing it on $(q,k)$-unbreakable graphs for appropriate parameters. Their proof is non-constructive, and they ask whether it can be made constructive. We prove that this is impossible: specifically, the parameter $q$ cannot be a computable function of $ϕ$.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2026

A Dividing Line for Structural Kernelization of Component Order Connectivity via Distance to Bounded Pathwidth

In this work we study a classic generalization of the Vertex Cover (VC) problem, called the Component Order Connectivity (COC) problem. In COC, given an undirected graph $G$, integers $d \geq 1$ and $k$, the goal is to determine if there is a set of at most $k$ vertices whose deletion results in a graph where each connected component has at most $d$ vertices. When $d=1$, this is exactly VC. This work is inspired by polynomial kernelization results with respect to structural parameters for VC. On one hand, Jansen & Bodlaender [TOCS 2013] show that VC admits a polynomial kernel when the parameter is the distance to treewidth-$1$ graphs, on the other hand Cygan, Lokshtanov, Pilipczuk, Pilipczuk & Saurabh [TOCS 2014] showed that VC does not admit a polynomial kernel when the parameter is distance to treewidth-$2$ graphs. Greilhuber & Sharma [IPEC 2024] showed that, for any $d \geq 2$, $d$-COC cannot admit a polynomial kernel when the parameter is distance to a forest of pathwidth $2$. Here, $d$-COC is the same as COC only that $d$ is a fixed constant not part of the input. We complement this result and show that like for the VC problem where distance to treewidth-$1$ graphs versus distance to treewidth-$2$ graphs is the dividing line between structural parameterizations that allow and respectively disallow polynomial kernelization, for COC this dividing line happens between distance to pathwidth-$1$ graphs and distance to pathwidth-$2$ graphs. The main technical result of this work is that COC admits a polynomial kernel parameterized by distance to pathwidth-$1$ graphs plus $d$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Maximum Partial List H-Coloring on P_5-free graphs in polynomial time

In this article we show that Maximum Partial List H-Coloring is polynomial-time solvable on P_5-free graphs for every fixed graph H. In particular, this implies that Maximum k-Colorable Subgraph is polynomial-time solvable on P_5-free graphs. This answers an open question from Agrawal, Lima, Lokshtanov, Saurabh & Sharma [SODA 2024]. This also improves the $n^{O(ω(G))}$-time algorithm for Maximum Partial H-Coloring by Chudnovsky, King, Pilipczuk, Rzążewski & Spirkl [SIDMA 2021] to polynomial-time algorithm.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Protrusion Decompositions Revisited: Uniform Lossy Kernels for Reducing Treewidth and Linear Kernels for Hitting Disconnected Minors

Let F be a finite family of graphs. In the F-Deletion problem, one is given a graph G and an integer k, and the goal is to find k vertices whose deletion results in a graph with no minor from the family F. This may be regarded as a far-reaching generalization of Vertex Cover and Feedback vertex Set. In their seminal work, Fomin, Lokshtanov, Misra & Saurabh [FOCS 2012] gave a polynomial kernel for this problem when the family F contains a planar graph. As the size of their kernel is g(F) * k^{f(F)}, a natural follow-up question was whether the dependence on F in the exponent of k can be avoided. The answer turned out to be negative: Giannapoulou, Jansen, Lokshtanov & Saurabh [TALG 2017] proved that this is already inevitable for the special case of the Treewidth-d-Deletion problem. In this work, we show that this non-uniformity can be avoided at the expense of a small loss. First, we present a simple 2-approximate kernelization algorithm for Treewidth-d-Deletion with kernel size g(d) * k^5. Next, we show that the approximation factor can be made arbitrarily close to 1, if we settle for a kernelization protocol with O(1) calls to an oracle that solves instances of size bounded by a uniform polynomial in k. We also obtain linear kernels on sparse graph classes when F contains a planar graph, whereas the previously known theorems required all graphs in F to be connected. Specifically, we generalize the kernelization algorithm by Kim, Langer, Paul, Reidl, Rossmanith, Sau & Sikdar [TALG 2015] on graph classes that exclude a topological minor.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Parameterized Complexity of Biclique Contraction and Balanced Biclique Contraction

In this work, we initiate the complexity study of Biclique Contraction and Balanced Biclique Contraction. In these problems, given as input a graph G and an integer k, the objective is to determine whether one can contract at most k edges in G to obtain a biclique and a balanced biclique, respectively. We first prove that these problems are NP-complete even when the input graph is bipartite. Next, we study the parameterized complexity of these problems and show that they admit single exponential-time FPT algorithms when parameterized by the number k of edge contractions. Then, we show that Balanced Biclique Contraction admits a quadratic vertex kernel while Biclique Contraction does not admit any polynomial compression (or kernel) under standard complexity-theoretic assumptions. We also give faster FPT algorithms for contraction to restricted bicliques.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Faster Exponential-Time Approximation Algorithms Using Approximate Monotone Local Search

We generalize the monotone local search approach of Fomin, Gaspers, Lokshtanov and Saurabh [J. ACM 2019], by establishing a connection between parameterized approximation and exponential-time approximation algorithms for monotone subset minimization problems. In a monotone subset minimization problem the input implicitly describes a non-empty set family over a universe of size $n$ which is closed under taking supersets. The task is to find a minimum cardinality set in this family. Broadly speaking, we use approximate monotone local search to show that a parameterized $α$-approximation algorithm that runs in $c^k \cdot n^{O(1)}$ time, where $k$ is the solution size, can be used to derive an $α$-approximation randomized algorithm that runs in $d^n \cdot n^{O(1)}$ time, where $d$ is the unique value in $d \in (1,1+\frac{c-1}α)$ such that $\mathcal{D}(\frac{1}α\|\frac{d-1}{c-1})=\frac{\ln c}α$ and $\mathcal{D}(a \|b)$ is the Kullback-Leibler divergence. This running time matches that of Fomin et al. for $α=1$, and is strictly better when $α>1$, for any $c > 1$. Furthermore, we also show that this result can be derandomized at the expense of a sub-exponential multiplicative factor in the running time. We demonstrate the potential of approximate monotone local search by deriving new and faster exponential approximation algorithms for Vertex Cover, $3$-Hitting Set, Directed Feedback Vertex Set, Directed Subset Feedback Vertex Set, Directed Odd Cycle Transversal and Undirected Multicut. For instance, we get a $1.1$-approximation algorithm for Vertex Cover with running time $1.114^n \cdot n^{O(1)}$, improving upon the previously best known $1.1$-approximation running in time $1.127^n \cdot n^{O(1)}$ by Bourgeois et al. [DAM 2011].

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

The Complexity of Contracting Bipartite Graphs into Small Cycles

For a positive integer $\ell \geq 3$, the $C_\ell$-Contractibility problem takes as input an undirected simple graph $G$ and determines whether $G$ can be transformed into a graph isomorphic to $C_\ell$ (the induced cycle on $\ell$ vertices) using only edge contractions. Brouwer and Veldman [JGT 1987] showed that $C_4$-Contractibility is NP-complete in general graphs. It is easy to verify that $C_3$-Contractibility is polynomial-time solvable. Dabrowski and Paulusma [IPL 2017] showed that $C_{\ell}$-Contractibility is \NP-complete\ on bipartite graphs for $\ell = 6$ and posed as open problems the status of the problem when $\ell$ is 4 or 5. In this paper, we show that both $C_5$-Contractibility and $C_4$-Contractibility are NP-complete on bipartite graphs.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2025

Problems in NP can Admit Double-Exponential Lower Bounds when Parameterized by Treewidth or Vertex Cover

Treewidth (tw) is an important parameter that, when bounded, yields tractability for many problems. For example, graph problems expressible in Monadic Second Order (MSO) logic and QUANTIFIED SAT or, more generally, QUANTIFIED CSP, are FPT parameterized by the tw of the input's (primal) graph plus the length of the MSO-formula [Courcelle, Information & Computation 1990] and the quantifier rank [Chen, ECAI 2004], resp. The algorithms from these (meta-)results have running times whose dependence on tw is a tower of exponents. A conditional lower bound by Fichte et al. [LICS 2020] shows that, for QUANTIFIED SAT, the height of this tower is equal to the number of quantifier alternations. Lower bounds showing that at least double-exponential factors in the running time are necessary are rare: there are very few (for tw and vertex cover vc parameterizations) and they are for problems that are complete for #NP, $Σ_2^p$, $Π_2^p$, or higher levels of the polynomial hierarchy. We show, for the first time, that it is not necessary to go higher up in the polynomial hierarchy to obtain such lower bounds. We design a novel, yet simple versatile technique based on Sperner families to obtain such lower bounds and apply it to 3 problems: METRIC DIMENSION, STRONG METRIC DIMENSION, and GEODETIC SET. We prove that they do not admit $2^{2^{o(tw)}} \cdot n^{O(1)}$-time algorithms, even on bounded diameter graphs, unless the ETH fails. For STRONG METRIC DIMENSION, the lower bound holds even for vc. We complement our lower bounds with matching upper bounds.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2025

Metric Dimension and Geodetic Set Parameterized by Vertex Cover

For a graph $G$, a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ is called a resolving set of $G$ if, for any two vertices $u,v\in V(G)$, there exists a vertex $w\in S$ such that $d(w,u)\neq d(w,v)$. The Metric Dimension problem takes as input a graph $G$ on $n$ vertices and a positive integer $k$, and asks whether there exists a resolving set of size at most $k$. In another metric-based graph problem, Geodetic Set, the input is a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, and the objective is to determine whether there exists a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ of size at most $k$ such that, for any vertex $u \in V(G)$, there are two vertices $s_1, s_2 \in S$ such that $u$ lies on a shortest path from $s_1$ to $s_2$. These two classical problems turn out to be intractable with respect to the natural parameter, i.e., the solution size, as well as most structural parameters, including the feedback vertex set number and pathwidth. Some of the very few existing tractable results state that they are both FPT with respect to the vertex cover number $vc$. More precisely, we observe that both problems admit an FPT algorithm running in time $2^{\mathcal{O}(vc^2)}\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$, and a kernelization algorithm that outputs a kernel with $2^{\mathcal{O}(vc)}$ vertices. We prove that unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fails, Metric Dimension and Geodetic Set, even on graphs of bounded diameter, neither admit an FPT algorithm running in time $2^{o(vc^2)}\cdot n^{\mathcal(1)}$, nor a kernelization algorithm that reduces the solution size and outputs a kernel with $2^{o(vc)}$ vertices. The versatility of our technique enables us to apply it to both these problems. We only know of one other problem in the literature that admits such a tight lower bound. Similarly, the list of known problems with exponential lower bounds on the number of vertices in kernelized instances is very short.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

MaxMin Separation Problems: FPT Algorithms for $st$-Separator and Odd Cycle Transversal

In this paper, we study the parameterized complexity of the MaxMin versions of two fundamental separation problems: Maximum Minimal $st$-Separator and Maximum Minimal Odd Cycle Transversal (OCT), both parameterized by the solution size. In the Maximum Minimal $st$-Separator problem, given a graph $G$, two distinct vertices $s$ and $t$ and a positive integer $k$, the goal is to determine whether there exists a minimal $st$-separator in $G$ of size at least $k$. Similarly, the Maximum Minimal OCT problem seeks to determine if there exists a minimal set of vertices whose deletion results in a bipartite graph, and whose size is at least $k$. We demonstrate that both problems are fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by $k$. Our FPT algorithm for Maximum Minimal $st$-Separator answers the open question by Hanaka, Bodlaender, van der Zanden and Ono (TCS 2019). One unique insight from this work is the following. We use the meta-result of Lokshtanov, Ramanujan, Saurabh and Zehavi (ICALP 2018) that enables us to reduce our problems to highly unbreakable graphs. This is interesting, as an explicit use of the recursive understanding and randomized contractions framework of Chitnis, Cygan, Hajiaghayi, Pilipczuk and Pilipczuk (SICOMP 2016) to reduce to the highly unbreakable graphs setting (which is the result that Lokshtanov et al. tries to abstract out in their meta-theorem) does not seem obvious because certain ``extension'' variants of our problems are W[1]-hard.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2024

Parameterized Approximation for Robust Clustering in Discrete Geometric Spaces

We consider the well-studied Robust $(k, z)$-Clustering problem, which generalizes the classic $k$-Median, $k$-Means, and $k$-Center problems. Given a constant $z\ge 1$, the input to Robust $(k, z)$-Clustering is a set $P$ of $n$ weighted points in a metric space $(M,δ)$ and a positive integer $k$. Further, each point belongs to one (or more) of the $m$ many different groups $S_1,S_2,\ldots,S_m$. Our goal is to find a set $X$ of $k$ centers such that $\max_{i \in [m]} \sum_{p \in S_i} w(p) δ(p,X)^z$ is minimized. This problem arises in the domains of robust optimization [Anthony, Goyal, Gupta, Nagarajan, Math. Oper. Res. 2010] and in algorithmic fairness. For polynomial time computation, an approximation factor of $O(\log m/\log\log m)$ is known [Makarychev, Vakilian, COLT $2021$], which is tight under a plausible complexity assumption even in the line metrics. For FPT time, there is a $(3^z+ε)$-approximation algorithm, which is tight under GAP-ETH [Goyal, Jaiswal, Inf. Proc. Letters, 2023]. Motivated by the tight lower bounds for general discrete metrics, we focus on \emph{geometric} spaces such as the (discrete) high-dimensional Euclidean setting and metrics of low doubling dimension, which play an important role in data analysis applications. First, for a universal constant $η_0 >0.0006$, we devise a $3^z(1-η_{0})$-factor FPT approximation algorithm for discrete high-dimensional Euclidean spaces thereby bypassing the lower bound for general metrics. We complement this result by showing that even the special case of $k$-Center in dimension $Θ(\log n)$ is $(\sqrt{3/2}- o(1))$-hard to approximate for FPT algorithms. Finally, we complete the FPT approximation landscape by designing an FPT $(1+ε)$-approximation scheme (EPAS) for the metric of sub-logarithmic doubling dimension.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Eliminating Crossings in Ordered Graphs

Drawing a graph in the plane with as few crossings as possible is one of the central problems in graph drawing and computational geometry. Another option is to remove the smallest number of vertices or edges such that the remaining graph can be drawn without crossings. We study both problems in a book-embedding setting for ordered graphs, that is, graphs with a fixed vertex order. In this setting, the vertices lie on a straight line, called the spine, in the given order, and each edge must be drawn on one of several pages of a book such that every edge has at most a fixed number of crossings. In book embeddings, there is another way to reduce or avoid crossings; namely by using more pages. The minimum number of pages needed to draw an ordered graph without any crossings is its (fixed-vertex-order) page number. We show that the page number of an ordered graph with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges can be computed in $2^m \cdot n^{O(1)}$ time. An $O(\log n)$-approximation of this number can be computed efficiently. We can decide in $2^{O(d \sqrt{k} \log (d+k))} \cdot n^{O(1)}$ time whether it suffices to delete $k$ edges of an ordered graph to obtain a $d$-planar layout (where every edge crosses at most $d$ other edges) on one page. As an additional parameter, we consider the size $h$ of a hitting set, that is, a set of points on the spine such that every edge, seen as an open interval, contains at least one of the points. For $h=1$, we can efficiently compute the minimum number of edges whose deletion yields fixed-vertex-order page number $p$. For $h>1$, we give an XP algorithm with respect to $h+p$. Finally, we consider spine+$t$-track drawings, where some but not all vertices lie on the spine. The vertex order on the spine is given; we must map every vertex that does not lie on the spine to one of $t$ tracks, each of which is a straight line on a separate page, parallel to the spine.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2024

Balanced Substructures in Bicolored Graphs

An edge-colored graph is said to be balanced if it has an equal number of edges of each color. Given a graph $G$ whose edges are colored using two colors and a positive integer $k$, the objective in the Edge Balanced Connected Subgraph problem is to determine if $G$ has a balanced connected subgraph containing at least $k$ edges. We first show that this problem is NP-complete and remains so even if the solution is required to be a tree or a path. Then, we focus on the parameterized complexity of Edge Balanced Connected Subgraph and its variants (where the balanced subgraph is required to be a path/tree) with respect to $k$ as the parameter. Towards this, we show that if a graph has a balanced connected subgraph/tree/path of size at least $k$, then it has one of size at least $k$ and at most $f(k)$ where $f$ is a linear function. We use this result combined with dynamic programming algorithms based on color coding and representative sets to show that Edge Balanced Connected Subgraph and its variants are FPT. Further, using polynomial-time reductions to the Multilinear Monomial Detection problem, we give faster randomized FPT algorithms for the problems. In order to describe these reductions, we define a combinatorial object called relaxed-subgraph. We define this object in such a way that balanced connected subgraphs, trees and paths are relaxed-subgraphs with certain properties. This object is defined in the spirit of branching walks known for the Steiner Tree problem and may be of independent interest.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Hitting Meets Packing: How Hard Can it Be?

We study a general family of problems that form a common generalization of classic hitting (also referred to as covering or transversal) and packing problems. An instance of X-HitPack asks: Can removing k (deletable) vertices of a graph G prevent us from packing $\ell$ vertex-disjoint objects of type X? This problem captures a spectrum of problems with standard hitting and packing on opposite ends. Our main motivating question is whether the combination X-HitPack can be significantly harder than these two base problems. Already for a particular choice of X, this question can be posed for many different complexity notions, leading to a large, so-far unexplored domain in the intersection of the areas of hitting and packing problems. On a high-level, we present two case studies: (1) X being all cycles, and (2) X being all copies of a fixed graph H. In each, we explore the classical complexity, as well as the parameterized complexity with the natural parameters k+l and treewidth. We observe that the combined problem can be drastically harder than the base problems: for cycles or for H being a connected graph with at least 3 vertices, the problem is Σ_2^P-complete and requires double-exponential dependence on the treewidth of the graph (assuming the Exponential-Time Hypothesis). In contrast, the combined problem admits qualitatively similar running times as the base problems in some cases, although significant novel ideas are required. For example, for X being all cycles, we establish a 2^poly(k+l)n^O(1) algorithm using an involved branching method. Also, for X being all edges (i.e., H = K_2; this combines Vertex Cover and Maximum Matching) the problem can be solved in time 2^\poly(tw)n^O(1) on graphs of treewidth tw. The key step enabling this running time relies on a combinatorial bound obtained from an algebraic (linear delta-matroid) representation of possible matchings.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Odd Cycle Transversal on $P_5$-free Graphs in Polynomial Time

An independent set in a graph G is a set of pairwise non-adjacent vertices. A graph $G$ is bipartite if its vertex set can be partitioned into two independent sets. In the Odd Cycle Transversal problem, the input is a graph $G$ along with a weight function $w$ associating a rational weight with each vertex, and the task is to find a smallest weight vertex subset $S$ in $G$ such that $G - S$ is bipartite; the weight of $S$, $w(S) = \sum_{v\in S} w(v)$. We show that Odd Cycle Transversal is polynomial-time solvable on graphs excluding $P_5$ (a path on five vertices) as an induced subgraph. The problem was previously known to be polynomial-time solvable on $P_4$-free graphs and NP-hard on $P_6$-free graphs [Dabrowski, Feghali, Johnson, Paesani, Paulusma and Rzążewski, Algorithmica 2020]. Bonamy, Dabrowski, Feghali, Johnson and Paulusma [Algorithmica 2019] posed the existence of a polynomial-time algorithm on $P_5$-free graphs as an open problem, this was later re-stated by Rzążewski [Dagstuhl Reports, 9(6): 2019] and by Chudnovsky, King, Pilipczuk, Rzążewski, and Spirkl [SIDMA 2021], who gave an algorithm with running time $n^{O(\sqrt{n})}$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Open Problems in (Hyper)Graph Decomposition

Large networks are useful in a wide range of applications. Sometimes problem instances are composed of billions of entities. Decomposing and analyzing these structures helps us gain new insights about our surroundings. Even if the final application concerns a different problem (such as traversal, finding paths, trees, and flows), decomposing large graphs is often an important subproblem for complexity reduction or parallelization. This report is a summary of discussions that happened at Dagstuhl seminar 23331 on "Recent Trends in Graph Decomposition" and presents currently open problems and future directions in the area of (hyper)graph decomposition.

cs.DS↗