SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2603.25115

When Sensing Varies with Contexts: Context Probing for Tactile Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning

Abstract

Few-shot class-incremental learning (FSCIL) aims to recognize novel classes from only a few labeled samples while retaining previously learned knowledge. Although recent FSCIL methods have achieved substantial progress on visual benchmarks, they remain limited in tactile sensing, where the same material may produce markedly different observations under different acquisition contexts, such as sensing devices, contact states, scanning trajectories, and interaction conditions. In tactile FSCIL, the challenges of few-shot learning and class-incremental learning are further amplified by acquisition context: the limited support samples may not only be scarce, but also carry context-induced biases. Once the resulting biased prototypes are inserted into the classifier, they may affect the decision boundaries in subsequent sessions. To address this problem, we propose Context-Probing Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning (CoP-FSCIL), a context-aware framework for tactile FSCIL. CoP-FSCIL first employs Context-Probing Intervention (CPI) to diagnose local context-sensitive variations in tactile representations. It then introduces a Probe-Conditioned Quotient Adapter (PCQA) to suppress context-sensitive components identified by the probes. Finally, Probe-Stability Prototype Calibration (PSPC) estimates support sample reliability from probe-induced embedding fluctuations and calibrates stochastic prototypes accordingly. Experiments on HapTex and LMT108 show that CoP-FSCIL consistently outperforms representative FSCIL baselines, and extended experiments on audio FSCIL further demonstrate the generality of the proposed context probing mechanism. The source code is currently being prepared and will be released soon.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yifeng Lin, Aiping Huang, Wenxi Liu, Si Wu, Tiesong Zhao, Zechao Li, Zheng-Jun Zha. 2026-03-26. When Sensing Varies with Contexts: Context Probing for Tactile Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25115

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI