Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2603.27155

Optimal Portfolio Compression for Priority-Proportional Clearing with Defaulting Costs

Gergely Csáji·Rareş-Ioan Mateiu·Alexandru Popa·Ildikó Schlotter
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study financial networks where banks are connected through bilateral liabilities and may default when resources are insufficient to meet obligations. We consider both the standard proportional clearing model and a priority-proportional clearing model in which banks repay creditors according to exogenously given priority classes. In such markets, portfolio compression is a process where several banks come to a netting arrangement which reduces liabilities without changing any bank's net exposure, essentially removing cycles of debt. Our goal is to understand whether portfolio compression schemes can be designed to improve clearing outcomes for a large fraction of banks. We provide a computational characterization of the benefits and limitations of compression. On the positive side, we give a polynomial-time algorithm to compute a maximal clearing outcome under priority-proportional clearing, and we show that it is possible to decide in polynomial time whether there exists a compression that limits defaults to at most one bank. On the negative side, we show that several natural optimization and decision problems are computationally intractable: deciding whether some compression can reduce the number of defaulting banks below a given threshold, or whether a specific bank can be saved from defaulting, is $\NP$-hard even in restricted settings and under proportional clearing. We further present a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) formulation that computes a compression maximizing the number of non-defaulting banks, providing a practical approach to this hard problem. Using our MILP formulation, we perform simulations on both synthetic and real-world datasets to analyze the effects of portfolio compression.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Gergely Csáji, Rareş-Ioan Mateiu, Alexandru Popa, Ildikó Schlotter. 2026-03-28. Optimal Portfolio Compression for Priority-Proportional Clearing with Defaulting Costs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27155

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗