SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2603.27203

The Cardinalities of Intervals of Equational Theories and Logics

Abstract

We study the cardinality of classes of equational theories (varieties) and logics by applying descriptive set theory. We affirmatively solve open problems raised by Jackson and Lee [Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 370 (2018), pp. 4785-4812] regarding the cardinalities of subvariety lattices, and by Bezhanishvili et al. [J. Math. Log. (2025), in press] regarding the degrees of the finite model property (fmp). By coding equations and formulas by natural numbers, and theories and logics by real numbers, we examine their position in the Borel hierarchy. We prove that every interval of equational theories in a countable language corresponds to a $\boldsymbol{\Pi}^0_1$ set, and every fmp span of a normal modal logic to a $\boldsymbol{\Pi}^0_2$ set. It follows that they have cardinality either $\leq \aleph_0$ or $2^{\aleph_0}$, provably in ZFC. In the same manner, we observe that the set of pretabular extensions of a tense logic is a $\boldsymbol{\Pi}^0_2$ set, so its cardinality is either $\leq \aleph_0$ or $2^{\aleph_0}$. We also point out a negative solution to another open problem raised by Jackson and Lee, op. cit., regarding the existence of independent systems, which relies on Je\v{z}ek et al. [Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 42 (1990), pp. 57-70].

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Juan P. Aguilera, Nick Bezhanishvili, Tenyo Takahashi. 2026-03-28. The Cardinalities of Intervals of Equational Theories and Logics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27203

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO