Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Juan P. Aguilera

Publications and source records attributed to Juan P. Aguilera.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Strong completeness of the logic J

We prove that the polymodal logic $\mathsf{J}$ is strongly complete with respect to \textit{$\mathsf{J}$-bouquets}, a topological refinement of its Kripke semantics. In particular, it is strongly topologically complete. This yields the following completeness result for the provability logic $\mathsf{GLP}$: a countable set of formulae $Γ$ is consistent with $\mathsf{GLP}$ if and only if there is a $\mathsf{J}$-bouquet $B$ and $r\in B$ such that $B, r\Vdash \mathsf{GLP}$ and $B, r\VdashΓ$. In contrast, we exhibit counterexamples showing that $\mathsf{GLP}$ is not strongly complete with respect to Beklemishev-Gabelaia spaces.

math.LO↗

The Cardinalities of Intervals of Equational Theories and Logics

We study the cardinality of classes of equational theories (varieties) and logics by applying descriptive set theory. We affirmatively solve open problems raised by Jackson and Lee [Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 370 (2018), pp. 4785-4812] regarding the cardinalities of subvariety lattices, and by Bezhanishvili et al. [J. Math. Log. (2025), in press] regarding the degrees of the finite model property (fmp). By coding equations and formulas by natural numbers, and theories and logics by real numbers, we examine their position in the Borel hierarchy. We prove that every interval of equational theories in a countable language corresponds to a $\boldsymbolΠ^0_1$ set, and every fmp span of a normal modal logic to a $\boldsymbolΠ^0_2$ set. It follows that they have cardinality either $\leq \aleph_0$ or $2^{\aleph_0}$, provably in ZFC. In the same manner, we observe that the set of pretabular extensions of a tense logic is a $\boldsymbolΠ^0_2$ set, so its cardinality is either $\leq \aleph_0$ or $2^{\aleph_0}$. We also point out a negative solution to another open problem raised by Jackson and Lee, op. cit., regarding the existence of independent systems, which relies on Ježek et al. [Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 42 (1990), pp. 57-70].

math.LO↗

Conditionals and Modalities in Constructive Quantum Logics

We investigate logics that generalize both intuitionistic logic and quantum logic. In earlier work, we introduced Ex-logic, an extension of Holliday's fundamental logic that coincides with the intersection of orthologic and the implication-free fragment of intuitionistic logic. In this paper, we add an implication connective to Ex-logic and axiomatize iEx-logic, the intersection of full intuitionistic logic and orthomodular logic with the implication connective interpreted as the Sasaki hook. As a consequence, we obtain a characterization of the lattice of logics extending iEx-logic as the product of the lattice of intermediate logics and the lattice of orthomodular logics. We also explore the robustness of our algebraic approach by briefly discussing extensions of iEx-logic with modal operators.

math.LO↗

Polytopological Semantics for Intuitionistic Modal Logics

We develop polytopological semantics for various constructive, intuitionistic, and Gödel--Dummett variations of $\mathsf{K4}$ and $\mathsf{S4}$. In our models, intuitionistic and modal operators are interpreted via various topologies over a single set, equipped with either the closure or derivative operators. We identify regularity conditions to ensure that spaces validate each of our target logics and prove that all the logics considered are sound and strongly complete with respect to their respective semantics.

math.LO↗

The Reverse Mathematics of Analytic Measurability

A classical theorem of Lusin states that all analytic sets are Lebesgue-measurable. In this article we established the reverse mathematical strength of Lusin's theorem, which depends on how precisely it is formalized. By doing so, we answer to a question of Simpson. Our main proof is motivated towards proving a specific version of that result, namely that analytic sets are Lesbesgue-regular, which requires the equality of the outer and inner measures of the set in question. We prove this statement to be equivalent to $Σ^{1}_{1}$-$\mathrm{IND}$ over $\mathrm{ATR}_{0}$. The full statement of the theorem, that is the one implying the existence of the measure as a real number, is equivalent to $Π^{1}_{1}$-$\mathrm{CA}_{0}$, again provably over $\mathrm{ATR}_{0}$. In our main proof, we draw inspiration from Solovay's construction of a model of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory where every set is Lebesgue measurable. In our case the argument requires the use of class forcing over a family of standard and non-standard models of a very weak set theory obtained through the method of pseudohierarchies.

math.LO↗

Large cardinals, structural reflection, and the HOD Conjecture

We introduce exacting cardinals and a strengthening of these, ultraexacting cardinals. These are natural large cardinals defined equivalently as weak forms of rank-Berkeley cardinals, strong forms of Jónsson cardinals, or in terms of principles of structural reflection. However, they challenge commonly held intuition on strong axioms of infinity. We prove that ultraexacting cardinals are consistent with Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory with the Axiom of Choice (ZFC) relative to the existence of an I0 embedding. However, the existence of an ultraexacting cardinal below a measurable cardinal implies the consistency of ZFC with a proper class of I0 embeddings, thus challenging the linear--incremental picture of the large cardinal hierarchy. We show that the existence of an exacting cardinal implies that V is not equal to HOD (Gödel's universe of Hereditarily Ordinal Definable sets), showing that these cardinals surpass the current hierarchy of large cardinals consistent with ZFC. Moreover, we prove that the existence of an exacting cardinal above an extendible cardinal implies the "V is far from HOD" alternative of Woodin's HOD Dichotomy. In particular, it follows that the consistency of ZFC with an exacting cardinal above an extendible cardinal would refute Woodin's HOD Conjecture and Ultimate-L Conjecture. Finally, we show that the consistency of ZF with certain large cardinals beyond choice implies the consistency of ZFC with the existence of an exacting cardinal above an extendible cardinal.

math.LO↗

Constructive Quantum Logics

Following a suggestion of Birkhoff and Von Neumann [Ann. Math. 37 (1936), 23-32], we pursue a joint study of quantum logic and intuitionistic logic. We exhibit a linear-time translation which for each quantum logic $Q$ and each superintuitionistic logic $I$ yields an axiomatization of $Q\cap I$ from axiomatizations of $Q$ and $I$. The translation is centered around a certain axiom (Ex) which (together with introduction and elimination rules for connectives) is shown to axiomatize the intersection of orthologic and intuitionistic logic, solving a problem of Holliday [Logics 1 (2023), pp. 36-79]. We prove that the lattice of all super-Ex logics is isomorphic to the product of the lattices of quantum logics and superintuitionistic logics in the signature $\{\land,\lor,\neg\}$. We prove that there are infinitely many sub-Ex logics extending Holliday's fundamental logic.

math.LO↗

Induction on Dilators and Bachmann-Howard Fixed Points

One of the most important principles of J.-Y. Girard's $Π^1_2$-logic is induction on dilators. In particular, Girard used this principle to construct his famous functor $Λ$. He claimed that the totality of $Λ$ is equivalent to the set existence axiom of $Π^1_1$-comprehension from reverse mathematics. While Girard provided a plausible description of a proof around 1980, it seems that the very technical details have not been worked out to this day. A few years ago, a loosely related approach led to an equivalence between $Π^1_1$-comprehension and a certain Bachmann-Howard principle. The present paper closes the circle. We relate the Bachmann-Howard principle to induction on dilators. This allows us to show that $Π^1_1$-comprehension is equivalent to the totality of a functor $\mathbb J$ due to P. Päppinghaus, which can be seen as a streamlined version of $Λ$.

math.LO↗

On some subtheories of strong dependent choice

In this paper, we give characterizations of the set of $Π^1_{e}$-consequences, $Σ^1_{e}$-consequences and $\mathsf{B}(Π^1_{e})$-consequences of the axiomatic system of the strong dependent choice for $Σ^1_i$ formulas $Σ^1_i$-$\mathsf{SDC}_0$ for $i > 0$ and $e < i+2$. Here, $\mathsf{B}(Γ)$ denotes the set generated by $\land,\lor,\lnot$ starting from $Γ$.

math.LO↗

Reflection Properties of Ordinals in Generic Extensions

We study the question of when a given countable ordinal $α$ is $Σ^1_n$- or $Π^1_n$-reflecting in models which are neither $\mathsf{PD}$ models nor the constructible universe, focusing on generic extensions of $L$. We prove, amongst other things, that adding any number of Cohen or random reals, or forcing with Sacks forcing or any lightface Borel weakly homogeneous ccc forcing notion cannot change such reflection properties. Moreover we show that collapse forcing increases the value of the least reflecting ordinals but, curiously, to ordinals which are still smaller than the $ω_1$ of $L$.

math.LO↗

The $Π^1_2$ Consequences of a Theory

We develop the abstract framework for a proof-theoretic analysis of theories with scope beyond ordinal numbers, resulting in an analog of Ordinal Analysis aimed at the study of theorems of complexity $Π^1_2$. This is done by replacing the use of ordinal numbers by particularly uniform, wellfoundedness preserving functors in the category of linear orders. Generalizing the notion of a proof-theoretic ordinal, we define the functorial $Π^1_2$ norm of a theory and prove its existence and uniqueness for $Π^1_2$-sound theories. From this, we further abstract a definition of the $Σ^1_2$- and $Π^1_2$-soundness ordinals of a theory; these quantify, respectively, the maximum strength of true $Σ^1_2$ theorems and minimum strength of false $Π^1_2$ theorems of a given theory. We study these ordinals, developing a proof-theoretic classification theory for recursively enumerable extensions of $\mathsf{ACA}_0$ Using techniques from infinitary and categorical proof theory, generalized recursion theory, constructibility, and forcing, we prove that an admissible ordinal is the $Π^1_2$-soundness ordinal of some recursively enumerable extension of $\mathsf{ACA}_0$ if and only if it is not parameter-free $Σ^1_1$-reflecting. We show that the $Σ^1_2$-soundness ordinal of $\mathsf{ACA}_0$ is $ω_1^{ck}$ and characterize the $Σ^1_2$-soundness ordinals of recursively enumerable, $Σ^1_2$-sound extensions of $Π^1_1{-}\mathsf{CA}_0$.

math.LO↗

Projective Games on the Reals

Let $M^\sharp_n(\mathbb{R})$ denote the minimal active iterable extender model which has $n$ Woodin cardinals and contains all reals, if it exists, in which case we denote by $M_n(\mathbb{R})$ the class-sized model obtained by iterating the topmost measure of $M_n(\mathbb{R})$ class-many times. We characterize the sets of reals which are $Σ_1$-definable from $\mathbb{R}$ over $M_n(\mathbb{R})$, under the assumption that projective games on reals are determined: (1) for even $n$, $Σ_1^{M_n(\mathbb{R})} = \Game^\mathbb{R}Π^1_{n+1}$; (2) for odd $n$, $Σ_1^{M_n(\mathbb{R})} = \Game^\mathbb{R}Σ^1_{n+1}$. This generalizes a theorem of Martin and Steel for $L(\mathbb{R})$, i.e., the case $n=0$. As consequences of the proof, we see that determinacy of all projective games with moves in $\mathbb{R}$ is equivalent to the statement that $M^\sharp_n(\mathbb{R})$ exists for all $n\in\mathbb{N}$, and that determinacy of all projective games of length $ω^2$ with moves in $\mathbb{N}$ is equivalent to the statement that $M^\sharp_n(\mathbb{R})$ exists and satisfies $\mathsf{AD}$ for all $n\in\mathbb{N}$.

math.LO↗

Long Games and $σ$-Projective Sets

We prove a number of results on the determinacy of $σ$-projective sets of reals, i.e., those belonging to the smallest pointclass containing the open sets and closed under complements, countable unions, and projections. We first prove the equivalence between $σ$-projective determinacy and the determinacy of certain classes of games of variable length ${<}ω^2$ (Theorem 2.4). We then give an elementary proof of the determinacy of $σ$-projective sets from optimal large-cardinal hypotheses (Theorem 4.4). Finally, we show how to generalize the proof to obtain proofs of the determinacy of $σ$-projective games of a given countable length and of games with payoff in the smallest $σ$-algebra containing the projective sets, from corresponding assumptions (Theorems 5.1 and 5.4).

math.LO↗

Ackermann and Goodstein go functorial

We present variants of Goodstein's theorem that are equivalent to arithmetical comprehension and to arithmetical transfinite recursion, respectively, over a weak base theory. These variants differ from the usual Goodstein theorem in that they (necessarily) entail the existence of complex infinite objects. As part of our proof, we show that the Veblen hierarchy of normal functions on the ordinals is closely related to an extension of the Ackermann function by direct limits.

math.LO↗

Determined Admissible Sets

It is shown, from hypotheses in the region of $ω^2$ Woodin cardinals, that there is a transitive model of KP + AD$_\mathbb{R}$ containing all reals.

math.LO↗

The consistency strength of long projective determinacy

We determine the consistency strength of determinacy for projective games of length $ω^2$. Our main theorem is that $\boldsymbolΠ^1_{n+1}$-determinacy for games of length $ω^2$ implies the existence of a model of set theory with $ω+ n$ Woodin cardinals. In a first step, we show that this hypothesis implies that there is a countable set of reals $A$ such that $M_n(A)$, the canonical inner model for $n$ Woodin cardinals constructed over $A$, satisfies $A = \mathbb{R}$ and the Axiom of Determinacy. Then we argue how to obtain a model with $ω+ n$ Woodin cardinal from this. We also show how the proof can be adapted to investigate the consistency strength of determinacy for games of length $ω^2$ with payoff in $\Game^\mathbb{R} \boldsymbolΠ^1_1$ or with $σ$-projective payoff.

math.LO↗

A Topological Completeness Theorem for Transfinite Provability Logic

We prove a topological completeness theorem for the modal logic GLP containing operators $\langleλ\rangle$ for $λ\in$ Ord intended to capture progressively stronger notions of consistency in mathematical theories. We show that, given a scattered space $X$ of large-enough rank, any sentence $ϕ$ consistent with GLP can be satisfied in a polytopological space based on the finitely many Icard topologies over $X$ that correspond to the finitely many modalities appearing in $ϕ$.

math.LO↗

Unsound Inferences Make Proofs Shorter

We give examples of calculi that extend Gentzen's sequent calculus LK by unsound quantifier inferences in such a way that (i) derivations lead only to true sequents, and (ii) proofs therein are non-elementarily shorter than LK-proofs.

math.LO↗