SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2604.09806

Algorithms for Standard-form ILP Problems via Koml\'os' Discrepancy Setting

Abstract

We study the standard-form ILP problem $\max\{ c^\top x \colon A x = b,\; x \in Z_{\geq 0}^n \}$, where $A\in Z^{k\times n}$ has full row rank. We obtain refined FPT algorithms parameterized by $k$ and $\Delta$, the maximum absolute value of a $k\times k$ minor of $A$. Our approach combines discrepancy-based dynamic programming with matrix discrepancy bounds in Koml\'os' setting. Let $\kappa_k$ denote the maximum discrepancy over all matrices with $k$ columns whose columns have Euclidean norm at most $1$. Up to polynomial factors in the input size, the optimization problem can be solved in time $O(\kappa_k)^{2k}\Delta^2$, and the corresponding feasibility problem in time $O(\kappa_k)^k\Delta$. Using the best currently known bound $\kappa_k=\widetilde O(\log^{1/4}k)$, this yields running times $O(\log k)^{\frac{k}{2}(1+o(1))}\Delta^2$ and $O(\log k)^{\frac{k}{4}(1+o(1))}\Delta$, respectively. Under the Koml\'os conjecture, the dependence on $k$ in both running times reduces to $2^{O(k)}$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Dmitry Gribanov, Tagir Khayaleyev, Mikhail Cherniavskii, Maxim Klimenko, Dmitry Malyshev, Stanislav Moiseev. 2026-04-10. Algorithms for Standard-form ILP Problems via Koml\'os' Discrepancy Setting. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.09806

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS