Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2604.12750

From Witness-Space Sharpness To Family-Pointwise Exactness For The Solvability Complexity Index

Christopher Sorg
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study how exact Solvability Complexity Index (SCI) statements should be formulated for families of computational problems rather than for single problems. While the equality \(\mathrm{SCI}_G (\mathcal P)=k\) is unambiguous for an individual computational problem \(\mathcal P\), the family setting requires one to distinguish family-pointwise exactness, witness-space sharpness, and worst-case exactness. We formalize this trichotomy, prove that witness-space sharpness coincides with worst-case exactness but is, in general, strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness, and give a canonical source-family example witnessing the strictness. We then establish two positive upgrade theorems: an abstract pullback principle and a concrete finite-query criterion guaranteeing that witness-space sharpness upgrades to family-pointwise exactness. Next, we introduce a decoder-regular finite-query transport preorder on SCI computational problems, prove that it is a preorder, derive a transport-saturation sufficient criterion extending the principal-source package, and show that the associated transport degrees need not form a lattice in full generality. We analyze the natural decoder classes \(\mathscr R_{\mathrm{cont}}\) and \(\mathscr R_{\mathrm{Bor}}\): on the full class the corresponding quotients are not upper semilattices, while on the nondegenerate subclass the preorder is upward and downward directed. Finally, we exhibit two natural positive families realizing the principal transport mechanism: exact integration on compact intervals and a fixed-window spectral decision family obtained by block-diagonal stabilization.

Explore related subjects

math.LOcs.CCmath.DSmath.FA

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Christopher Sorg. 2026-04-14. From Witness-Space Sharpness To Family-Pointwise Exactness For The Solvability Complexity Index. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12750

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO↗