arXiv · 2604.18774
A simulation study to resolve conflicting evidence on the error rates from MANOVA group tests
Abstract
Popular software packages report four generalizations of the ANOVA F test when conducting a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). The reported operating characteristics of these fours tests vary widely depending on which research article the reader chooses. Some studies report extremely high type I error rates for a particular test even under ideal assumptions of multivariate normality and homoskedasticity; other studies report rates near the nominal level despite violations of the model assumptions. This simulation study seeks to clarify this apparent contradiction by providing a systematic evaluation of the type I error rates of the four statistics used to test for a group effect in MANOVA.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Joseph D Consiglio. 2026-04-20. A simulation study to resolve conflicting evidence on the error rates from MANOVA group tests. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18774
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.