SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2604.20905

Designing for the Development of Probabilistic Thinking: A Design-Based Research Study in Lower Secondary Education

Abstract

Drawing on the Data and Predictions strand of the Indicazioni Nazionali per il curricolo 2012, this study proposes a problem based instructional approach to the teaching of probability. More specifically, the study adopts a design based research methodology structured in a single cycle consisting of two teaching interventions in the same class, carried out in two consecutive years. Within this framework, a set of carefully selected problems is employed to foster students engagement. These problems are designed not only to introduce probabilistic concepts, but also to stimulate students' communicative and argumentative skills. The selected tasks provide opportunities to promote key process goals (such as reasoning and proving, communicating, representing, and making connections) which are often overshadowed by a predominant focus on content goals. This approach aims to support teachers in addressing the difficulties they frequently encounter in guiding students conceptualization processes, particularly in bridging the gap between students intuitive reasoning and formal abstraction. At the same time, it seeks to help students develop more robust and flexible forms of thinking, enabling them to better navigate situations involving uncertainty in everyday life.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Luigia Caputo, Aniello Buonocore. 2026-04-21. Designing for the Development of Probabilistic Thinking: A Design-Based Research Study in Lower Secondary Education. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20905

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO