SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2605.06398

On the Parameterized Approximability of (Mergeable) Sum of Radii Clustering

Abstract

The sum of radii problem ($k$-MSR) asks, given a metric space on $n$ points, to place $k$ balls covering all points so as to minimize the sum of their radii. Despite extensive study from the perspectives of approximation and parameterized algorithms, the exact parameterized complexity of the problem and the existence of efficient parameterized approximation schemes remained open. We advance this understanding on both the hardness and algorithmic fronts. We begin by showing that $k$-MSR is $W[2]$-hard parameterized by $k$, thereby pinpointing its location in the $W$-hierarchy. Moreover, via our reduction, we rule out efficient parameterized approximation schemes (EPAS)--that is, $(1+\epsilon)$-approximations running in time $f(k,\epsilon)\cdot \mathrm{poly}(n)$--unless $W[2] = FPT$. Assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis, we further rule out such algorithms running in time $f(k,\epsilon)\cdot n^{o(k)}$, strengthening recent lower bounds for the problem. On the algorithmic side, we study $k$-MSR under the framework of mergeable constraints, which captures a broad class of clustering constraints, including fairness, diversity, and lower bounds. We obtain an FPT $(\frac{8}{3}+\epsilon)$-approximation, improving upon the previous best guarantee of $(4+\epsilon)$. Moreover, given access to a suitable assignment subroutine, we achieve a $(2+\epsilon)$-approximation, matching the best known bound for the unconstrained problem. This, in turn, yields $(2+\epsilon)$ FPT-approximations for several important settings, including $(t,k)$-fair, $(\alpha,\beta)$-fair, $\ell$-diversity, and private clustering.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ameet Gadekar. 2026-05-07. On the Parameterized Approximability of (Mergeable) Sum of Radii Clustering. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06398

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS