SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2605.06491

Inference on Linear Regressions with Two-Way Unobserved Heterogeneity

Abstract

We develop a general estimation and inference procedure for the common parameters in linear panel data regression models with nonparametric two-way specification of unobserved heterogeneity. The procedure takes as input any first-step estimators of the nonparametric regression function and the fixed effects and relies on two key ingredients: First, we develop moment conditions for the common parameters that are Neyman orthogonal with respect to the nonparametric regression function. Second, we employ a novel adjustment of the nonparametric regression estimator so the estimated fixed effects do not generate incidental parameter biases. Together, these ensure that the resulting estimator of the common parameters is root-NT -- asymptotically normally distributed under weak conditions on the estimators of fixed effects and regression function. Next, we propose a novel two-step estimator of the nonparametric regression function and the fixed effects and verify that this particular estimator satisfies the conditions of our general theory. A numerical study shows that the proposed estimators perform well in finite samples.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hugo Freeman, Dennis Kristensen. 2026-05-07. Inference on Linear Regressions with Two-Way Unobserved Heterogeneity. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06491

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM