SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2605.13800

Low-Cost Arborescence Under Edge Faults

Abstract

Our input is a directed graph $G = (V,E)$ on $n$ vertices and $m$ edges with a designated root vertex $r$ and a function $cost: E \rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}$. The problem is to maintain a min-cost arborescence in $G$ in the presence of edge faults (a single fault at a time). Edge faults are transient and once the faulty edge is repaired, the original min-cost arborescence $\mathcal{T}$ is restored. Whenever an edge fault happens, we need to update $\mathcal{T}$ to a min-cost arborescence in $G-f$, where $f$ is the faulty edge. Since computing a min-cost arborescence in $G - f$ takes $O(m + n\log n)$ time, we seek to construct a sparse subgraph $H$ in a preprocessing step such that in the event of any edge $f$ failing, it suffices to compute a min-cost arborescence in $H - f$ in order to find a low-cost arborescence in $G - f$. In the unweighted setting, this is the fault-tolerant subgraph problem for single-source {\em reachability}. Baswana, Choudhary, and Roditty (SICOMP, 2018) showed a $k$-fault tolerant reachability subgraph of size $O(2^kn)$, where $k$ is the number of edge faults. We show a simple polynomial-time algorithm to construct a subgraph $H$ of size $O(n^{3/2})$ such that, for any $f \in E$, a min-cost arborescence in $H-f$ is a 2-approximation of a min-cost arborescence in $G-f$. Thus whenever an edge fault happens, we can find a 2-approximate min-cost arborescence in $G-f$ in $O(n^{3/2})$ time. Our second problem is in the matroid setting. The input is a matroid $M = (E, {\cal I})$ with a function $cost: E \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$. The problem is to compute a sparse $S \subseteq E$ (called a $k$-fault tolerant preserver) such that for any $F \subseteq E$ with $|F| \le k$, the matroid $M|(S\setminus F)$ contains a min-cost basis of $M|(E\setminus F)$. We show a tight bound of $k.rank(E)$ on the size of a $k$-fault tolerant preserver.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Dipan Dey, Telikepalli Kavitha. 2026-05-13. Low-Cost Arborescence Under Edge Faults. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.13800

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS