SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2605.19870

Deterministic Single Exponential Time Algorithms for Co-Path Packing and Co-Path Set Parameterized by Treewidth

Abstract

The \textsc{Co-Path Packing} (resp., \textsc{Co-Path Set}) problem asks whether a given graph can be edited to a collection of induced paths by deleting at most $k$ vertices (resp., $k$ edges). Both are fundamental problems with significant applications in bioinformatics and have been extensively studied within the framework of exact and parameterized algorithms. Currently, the state-of-the-art approach utilizes the randomized ``Cut \& Count'' technique, which solves \textsc{Co-Path Set} in $O^*(4^{\mathbf{tw}})$ time and \textsc{Co-Path Packing} in $O^*(5^{\mathbf{pw}})$ time, where $\mathbf{tw}$ is treewidth and $\mathbf{pw}$ is pathwidth. However, as there is no known method to derandomize the ``Cut \& Count'' technique, the existence of deterministic single exponential time algorithms for these problems parameterized by treewidth has remained an open question. In this paper, we resolve this gap by providing deterministic single exponential time algorithms for both problems when parameterized by treewidth.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yuxi Liu, Kangyi Tian, Mingyu Xiao. 2026-05-19. Deterministic Single Exponential Time Algorithms for Co-Path Packing and Co-Path Set Parameterized by Treewidth. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19870

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS