arXiv subjects

Kangyi Tian

Publications and source records attributed to Kangyi Tian.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Deterministic Single Exponential Time Algorithms for Co-Path Packing and Co-Path Set Parameterized by Treewidth

The \textsc{Co-Path Packing} (resp., \textsc{Co-Path Set}) problem asks whether a given graph can be edited to a collection of induced paths by deleting at most $k$ vertices (resp., $k$ edges). Both are fundamental problems with significant applications in bioinformatics and have been extensively studied within the framework of exact and parameterized algorithms. Currently, the state-of-the-art approach utilizes the randomized ``Cut \& Count'' technique, which solves \textsc{Co-Path Set} in $O^*(4^{\mathbf{tw}})$ time and \textsc{Co-Path Packing} in $O^*(5^{\mathbf{pw}})$ time, where $\mathbf{tw}$ is treewidth and $\mathbf{pw}$ is pathwidth. However, as there is no known method to derandomize the ``Cut \& Count'' technique, the existence of deterministic single exponential time algorithms for these problems parameterized by treewidth has remained an open question. In this paper, we resolve this gap by providing deterministic single exponential time algorithms for both problems when parameterized by treewidth.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A Note on Interdiction of Linear Minimization Problems

Motivated by the FPTAS for connectivity interdiction of Huang et al. (IPCO'24), we isolate the part of the argument that does not use cuts. The setting is a minimization problem over a feasible-set family $\mathcal F$ with a linear objective $w(S)=\sum_{e\in S}w(e)$. After dualizing the interdiction budget, deletion can be absorbed into truncated weights $w_\lambda(e)=\min\{w(e),\lambda c(e)\}$. At an optimal Lagrange multiplier $\lambda^*$, the unknown optimal interdiction witness is a strict $2$-approximate minimizer of the reweighted problem. Thus an exact algorithm can be obtained whenever one can optimize $w_{\lambda^*}$ over $\mathcal F$, enumerate all its $2$-approximate minimizers, and solve the remaining knapsack problem.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A Faster Deterministic Algorithm for Kidney Exchange via Representative Set

The Kidney Exchange Problem is a prominent challenge in healthcare and economics, arising in the context of organ transplantation. It has been extensively studied in artificial intelligence and optimization. In a kidney exchange, a set of donor-recipient pairs and altruistic donors are considered, with the goal of identifying a sequence of exchange -- comprising cycles or chains starting from altruistic donors -- such that each donor provides a kidney to the compatible recipient in the next donor-recipient pair. Due to constraints in medical resources, some limits are often imposed on the lengths of these cycles and chains. These exchanges create a network of transplants aimed at maximizing the total number, $t$, of successful transplants. Recently, this problem was deterministically solved in $O^*(14.34^t)$ time (IJCAI 2024). In this paper, we introduce the representative set technique for the Kidney Exchange Problem, showing that the problem can be deterministically solved in $O^*(6.855^t)$ time.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Faster Parameterized Vertex Multicut

In the {\sc Vertex Multicut} problem the input consists of a graph $G$, integer $k$, and a set $\mathbf{T} = \{(s_1, t_1), \ldots, (s_p, t_p)\}$ of pairs of vertices of $G$. The task is to find a set $X$ of at most $k$ vertices such that, for every $(s_i, t_i) \in \mathbf{T}$, there is no path from $s_i$ to $t_i$ in $G - X$. Marx and Razgon [STOC 2011 and SICOMP 2014] and Bousquet, Daligault, and Thomass\'{e} [STOC 2011 and SICOMP 2018] independently and simultaneously gave the first algorithms for {\sc Vertex Multicut} with running time $f(k)n^{O(1)}$. The running time of their algorithms is $2^{O(k^3)}n^{O(1)}$ and $2^{O(k^{O(1)})}n^{O(1)}$, respectively. As part of their result, Marx and Razgon introduce the {\em shadow removal} technique, which was subsequently applied in algorithms for several parameterized cut and separation problems. The shadow removal step is the only step of the algorithm of Marx and Razgon which requires $2^{O(k^3)}n^{O(1)}$ time. Chitnis et al. [TALG 2015] gave an improved version of the shadow removal step, which, among other results, led to a $k^{O(k^2)}n^{O(1)}$ time algorithm for {\sc Vertex Multicut}. We give a faster algorithm for the {\sc Vertex Multicut} problem with running time $k^{O(k)}n^{O(1)}$. Our main technical contribution is a refined shadow removal step for vertex separation problems that only introduces an overhead of $k^{O(k)}\log n$ time. The new shadow removal step implies a $k^{O(k^2)}n^{O(1)}$ time algorithm for {\sc Directed Subset Feedback Vertex Set} and a $k^{O(k)}n^{O(1)}$ time algorithm for {\sc Directed Multiway Cut}, improving over the previously best known algorithms of Chitnis et al. [TALG 2015].

cs.DS↗