Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2605.22813

Optimal Testing of Reed-Muller Codes with an Online Adversary

Esty Kelman·Uri Meir·Kai Zhe Zheng
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Motivated by applications to property testing in the online-erasure model of Kalemaj, Raskhodnikova, and Varma (ITCS 2022 and Theory of Computing 2023), we define and analyze {\em semi-sample-based testers} for Reed-Muller codes. The task in Reed-Muller testing is to determine whether an input function $f: \F^n \to \F$ belongs to the Reed-Muller code or is far from it, using as few point queries to $f$ as possible. Reed-Muller testing is a well-studied task with its roots in both the Property Testing and Probabilistically Checkable Proofs literature. The online-erasure model introduces a twist: after each query made, an adversary may erase up to $t$ points of the input function, potentially thwarting any test in which the queries follow a predictable pattern. Semi-sample-based testers are a hybrid between sample-based testers -- which can only make uniformly random queries to the input function -- and standard testers, which can choose their queries freely. They are designed with the online-erasure model in mind and operate by first choosing some subset $S$ of the domain and then making their queries uniformly at random inside of $S$. We describe semi-sample-based testers for the Reed-Muller code and give an optimal analysis of their soundness. Consequently, we show that semi-sample-based testers are indeed effective in the presence of online erasures, and thereby achieve optimal query complexity for testing the Reed-Muller code in the online-erasure model. This result improves upon prior work of Minzer and Zheng (SODA 2024). As an added bonus, we show that semi-sample-based testers also exist for the lifted affine-invariant codes of Guo, Kopparty, and Sudan (ITCS 2013), thereby providing the first known testers for these codes in the online-erasure model.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Esty Kelman, Uri Meir, Kai Zhe Zheng. 2026-05-21. Optimal Testing of Reed-Muller Codes with an Online Adversary. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22813

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗