arXiv subjects

Esty Kelman

Publications and source records attributed to Esty Kelman.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Forbidden Intersection Theorems for Matrix Spaces

A family of $m \times n$ matrices $\mathcal{F} \subseteq \mathbb{F}_q^{m \times n}$ is {$(t-1)$-intersection-free} if $\dim \ker(A-B) \neq t-1$ for all $A,B \in \mathcal{F}$. A \emph{forbidden $(t-1)$-intersection problem} for a collection of matrices asks for the size and structure of extremal $(t-1)$-intersection-free families within that collection. We solve this problem in $\mathrm{GL}(n,q)$ for all pairs $(n,t)$ such that $t 0$. We also give Frankl--R\"odl-type constructions showing that this range of $t$ is almost the best possible: we show that for values of $t>n/2$ the extremal behavior changes and no clean analogue is expected. Our proof builds upon recent global hypercontractivity results for matrix spaces due to Evra, Kindler, and Lifshitz, and broadly applies to any sufficiently dense class of matrices.

math.CO↗

arXiv2026

Optimal Testing of Reed-Muller Codes with an Online Adversary

Motivated by applications to property testing in the online-erasure model of Kalemaj, Raskhodnikova, and Varma (ITCS 2022 and Theory of Computing 2023), we define and analyze {\em semi-sample-based testers} for Reed-Muller codes. The task in Reed-Muller testing is to determine whether an input function $f: \F^n \to \F$ belongs to the Reed-Muller code or is far from it, using as few point queries to $f$ as possible. Reed-Muller testing is a well-studied task with its roots in both the Property Testing and Probabilistically Checkable Proofs literature. The online-erasure model introduces a twist: after each query made, an adversary may erase up to $t$ points of the input function, potentially thwarting any test in which the queries follow a predictable pattern. Semi-sample-based testers are a hybrid between sample-based testers -- which can only make uniformly random queries to the input function -- and standard testers, which can choose their queries freely. They are designed with the online-erasure model in mind and operate by first choosing some subset $S$ of the domain and then making their queries uniformly at random inside of $S$. We describe semi-sample-based testers for the Reed-Muller code and give an optimal analysis of their soundness. Consequently, we show that semi-sample-based testers are indeed effective in the presence of online erasures, and thereby achieve optimal query complexity for testing the Reed-Muller code in the online-erasure model. This result improves upon prior work of Minzer and Zheng (SODA 2024). As an added bonus, we show that semi-sample-based testers also exist for the lifted affine-invariant codes of Guo, Kopparty, and Sudan (ITCS 2013), thereby providing the first known testers for these codes in the online-erasure model.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Efficient Algorithms for Adversarially Robust Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search

We study the Approximate Nearest Neighbor (ANN) problem under a powerful adaptive adversary that controls both the dataset and a sequence of $Q$ queries. Primarily, for the high-dimensional regime of $d = \omega(\sqrt{Q})$, we introduce a sequence of algorithms with progressively stronger guarantees. We first establish a novel connection between adaptive security and \textit{fairness}, leveraging fair ANN search to hide internal randomness from the adversary with information-theoretic guarantees. To achieve data-independent performance, we then reduce the search problem to a robust decision primitive, solved using a differentially private mechanism on a Locality-Sensitive Hashing (LSH) data structure. This approach, however, faces an inherent $\sqrt{n}$ query time barrier. To break the barrier, we propose a novel concentric-annuli LSH construction that synthesizes these fairness and differential privacy techniques. The analysis introduces a new method for robustly releasing timing information from the underlying algorithm instances and, as a corollary, also improves existing results for fair ANN. In addition, for the low-dimensional regime $d = O(\sqrt{Q})$, we propose specialized algorithms that provide a strong ``for-all'' guarantee: correctness on \textit{every} possible query with high probability. We introduce novel metric covering constructions that simplify and improve prior approaches for ANN in Hamming and $\ell_p$ spaces.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Homomorphism Testing with Resilience to Online Manipulations

A central challenge in property testing is verifying algebraic structure with minimal access to data. A landmark result addressing this challenge, the linearity test of Blum, Luby, and Rubinfeld (JCSS `93), spurred a rich body of work on testing algebraic properties such as linearity and its generalizations to low-degree polynomials and group homomorphisms. However, classical tests for these properties assume unrestricted, noise-free access to the input function--an assumption that breaks down in adversarial or dynamic settings. To address this, Kalemaj, Raskhodnikova, and Varma (Theory of Computing `23) introduced the online manipulation model, where an adversary may erase or corrupt query responses over time, based on the tester's past queries. We initiate the study of {manipulation-resilient} testing for {group homomorphism} in this online model. Our main result is an {optimal} tester that makes $O(1/\varepsilon+\log t)$ queries, where $\varepsilon$ is the distance parameter and $t$ is the number of function values the adversary can erase or corrupt per query. Our result recovers the celebrated $O(1/\varepsilon)$ bound by Ben-Or, Coppersmith, Luby, and Rubinfeld (Random Struct.\ Algorithms `08) for homomorphism testing in the standard property testing model, albeit with a different tester. Our tester, $\mathsf{Random\ Signs\ Test}$, {lifts} known manipulation-resilient linearity testers for $\mathbb{F}_2^n\to \mathbb{F}_2$ to general group domains and codomains by introducing more randomness: instead of verifying the homomorphism condition for a sum of random elements, it uses additions and subtractions of random elements, randomly selecting a sign for each element. We also obtain improved group-specific query bounds for key families of groups.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Online versus Offline Adversaries in Property Testing

We study property testing with incomplete or noisy inputs. The models we consider allow for adversarial manipulation of the input, but differ in whether the manipulation can be done only offline, i.e., before the execution of the algorithm, or online, i.e., as the algorithm runs. The manipulations by an adversary can come in the form of erasures or corruptions. We compare the query complexity and the randomness complexity of property testing in the offline and online models. Kalemaj, Raskhodnikova, and Varma (Theory Comput `23) provide properties that can be tested with a small number of queries with offline erasures, but cannot be tested at all with online erasures. We demonstrate that the two models are incomparable in terms of query complexity: we construct properties that can be tested with a constant number of queries in the online corruption model, but require querying a significant fraction of the input in the offline erasure model. We also construct properties that exhibit a strong separation between the randomness complexity of testing in the presence of offline and online adversaries: testing these properties in the online model requires exponentially more random bits than in the offline model, even when they are tested with nearly the same number of queries in both models. Our randomness separation relies on a novel reduction from randomness-efficient testers in the adversarial online model to query-efficient testers in the standard model.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

On Optimal Testing of Linearity

Linearity testing has been a focal problem in property testing of functions. We combine different known techniques and observations about linearity testing in order to resolve two recent versions of this task. First, we focus on the online manipulations model introduced by Kalemaj, Raskhodnikova and Varma (ITCS 2022 \& Theory of Computing 2023). In this model, up to $t$ data entries are adversarially manipulated after each query is answered. Ben-Eliezer, Kelman, Meir, and Raskhodnikova (ITCS 2024) showed an asymptotically optimal linearity tester that is resilient to $t$ manipulations per query, but their approach fails if $t$ is too large. We extend this result, showing an optimal tester for almost any possible value of $t$. First, we simplify their result when $t$ is small, and for larger values of $t$ we instead use sample-based testers, as defined by Goldreich and Ron (ACM Transactions on Computation Theory 2016). A key observation is that sample-based testing is resilient to online manipulations, but still achieves optimal query complexity for linearity when $t$ is large. We complement our result by showing that when $t$ is \emph{very} large, any reasonable property, and in particular linearity, cannot be tested at all. Second, we consider linearity over the reals with proximity parameter $\varepsilon$. Fleming and Yoshida (ITCS 2020) gave a tester using $O(1/\varepsilon\ \cdot log(1/\varepsilon))$ queries. We simplify their algorithms and modify the analysis accordingly, showing an optimal tester that only uses $O(1/\varepsilon)$ queries. This modification works for the low-degree testers presented in Arora, Bhattacharyya, Fleming, Kelman, and Yoshida (SODA 2023) as well, resulting in optimal testers for degree-$d$ polynomials, for any constant degree $d$.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2024

Outlier Robust Multivariate Polynomial Regression

We study the problem of robust multivariate polynomial regression: let $p\colon\mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}$ be an unknown $n$-variate polynomial of degree at most $d$ in each variable. We are given as input a set of random samples $(\mathbf{x}_i,y_i) \in [-1,1]^n \times \mathbb{R}$ that are noisy versions of $(\mathbf{x}_i,p(\mathbf{x}_i))$. More precisely, each $\mathbf{x}_i$ is sampled independently from some distribution $χ$ on $[-1,1]^n$, and for each $i$ independently, $y_i$ is arbitrary (i.e., an outlier) with probability at most $ρ< 1/2$, and otherwise satisfies $|y_i-p(\mathbf{x}_i)|\leqσ$. The goal is to output a polynomial $\hat{p}$, of degree at most $d$ in each variable, within an $\ell_\infty$-distance of at most $O(σ)$ from $p$. Kane, Karmalkar, and Price [FOCS'17] solved this problem for $n=1$. We generalize their results to the $n$-variate setting, showing an algorithm that achieves a sample complexity of $O_n(d^n\log d)$, where the hidden constant depends on $n$, if $χ$ is the $n$-dimensional Chebyshev distribution. The sample complexity is $O_n(d^{2n}\log d)$, if the samples are drawn from the uniform distribution instead. The approximation error is guaranteed to be at most $O(σ)$, and the run-time depends on $\log(1/σ)$. In the setting where each $\mathbf{x}_i$ and $y_i$ are known up to $N$ bits of precision, the run-time's dependence on $N$ is linear. We also show that our sample complexities are optimal in terms of $d^n$. Furthermore, we show that it is possible to have the run-time be independent of $1/σ$, at the cost of a higher sample complexity.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Property Testing with Online Adversaries

The online manipulation-resilient testing model, proposed by Kalemaj, Raskhodnikova and Varma (ITCS 2022 and Theory of Computing 2023), studies property testing in situations where access to the input degrades continuously and adversarially. Specifically, after each query made by the tester is answered, the adversary can intervene and either erase or corrupt $t$ data points. In this work, we investigate a more nuanced version of the online model in order to overcome old and new impossibility results for the original model. We start by presenting an optimal tester for linearity and a lower bound for low-degree testing of Boolean functions in the original model. We overcome the lower bound by allowing batch queries, where the tester gets a group of queries answered between manipulations of the data. Our batch size is small enough so that function values for a single batch on their own give no information about whether the function is of low degree. Finally, to overcome the impossibility results of Kalemaj et al. for sortedness and the Lipschitz property of sequences, we extend the model to include $t<1$, i.e., adversaries that make less than one erasure per query. For sortedness, we characterize the rate of erasures for which online testing can be performed, exhibiting a sharp transition from optimal query complexity to impossibility of testability (with any number of queries). Our online tester works for a general class of local properties of sequences. One feature of our results is that we get new (and in some cases, simpler) optimal algorithms for several properties in the standard property testing model.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Sparse graph counting and Kelley-Meka bounds for binary systems

In a recent breakthrough, Kelley and Meka (FOCS 2023) obtained a strong upper bound on the density of sets of integers without nontrivial three-term arithmetic progressions. In this work, we extend their result, establishing similar bounds for all linear patterns defined by binary systems of linear forms, where "binary" indicates that every linear form depends on exactly two variables. Prior to our work, no strong bounds were known for such systems even in the finite field model setting. A key ingredient in our proof is a graph counting lemma. The classical graph counting lemma, developed by Thomason (Random Graphs 1985) and Chung, Graham, and Wilson (Combinatorica 1989), is a fundamental tool in combinatorics. For a fixed graph $H$, it states that the number of copies of $H$ in a pseudorandom graph $G$ is similar to the number of copies of $H$ in a purely random graph with the same edge density as $G$. However, this lemma is only non-trivial when $G$ is a dense graph. In this work, we prove a graph counting lemma that is also effective when $G$ is sparse. Moreover, our lemma is well-suited for density increment arguments in additive number theory. As an immediate application, we obtain a strong bound for the Tur\'an problem in abelian Cayley sum graphs: let $\Gamma$ be a finite abelian group with odd order. If a Cayley sum graph on $\Gamma$ does not contain any $r$-clique as a subgraph, it must have at most $2^{-\Omega_r(\log^{1/16}|\Gamma|)}\cdot |\Gamma|^2$ edges. These results hinge on the technology developed by Kelley and Meka and the follow-up work by Kelley, Lovett, and Meka (STOC 2024).

math.CO↗

arXiv2022

Low Degree Testing over the Reals

We study the problem of testing whether a function $f: \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}$ is a polynomial of degree at most $d$ in the \emph{distribution-free} testing model. Here, the distance between functions is measured with respect to an unknown distribution $\mathcal{D}$ over $\mathbb{R}^n$ from which we can draw samples. In contrast to previous work, we do not assume that $\mathcal{D}$ has finite support. We design a tester that given query access to $f$, and sample access to $\mathcal{D}$, makes $(d/\varepsilon)^{O(1)}$ many queries to $f$, accepts with probability $1$ if $f$ is a polynomial of degree $d$, and rejects with probability at least $2/3$ if every degree-$d$ polynomial $P$ disagrees with $f$ on a set of mass at least $\varepsilon$ with respect to $\mathcal{D}$. Our result also holds under mild assumptions when we receive only a polynomial number of bits of precision for each query to $f$, or when $f$ can only be queried on rational points representable using a logarithmic number of bits. Along the way, we prove a new stability theorem for multivariate polynomials that may be of independent interest.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Towards a Proof of the Fourier--Entropy Conjecture?

The total influence of a function is a central notion in analysis of Boolean functions, and characterizing functions that have small total influence is one of the most fundamental questions associated with it. The KKL theorem and the Friedgut junta theorem give a strong characterization of such functions whenever the bound on the total influence is $o(\log n)$. However, both results become useless when the total influence of the function is $ω(\log n)$. The only case in which this logarithmic barrier has been broken for an interesting class of functions was proved by Bourgain and Kalai, who focused on functions that are symmetric under large enough subgroups of $S_n$. In this paper, we build and improve on the techniques of the Bourgain-Kalai paper and establish new concentration results on the Fourier spectrum of Boolean functions with small total influence. Our results include: 1. A quantitative improvement of the Bourgain--Kalai result regarding the total influence of functions that are transitively symmetric. 2. A slightly weaker version of the Fourier--Entropy Conjecture of Friedgut and Kalai. This weaker version implies in particular that the Fourier spectrum of a constant variance, Boolean function $f$ is concentrated on $2^{O(I[f]\log I[f])}$ characters, improving an earlier result of Friedgut. Removing the $\log I[f]$ factor would essentially resolve the Fourier--Entropy Conjecture, as well as settle a conjecture of Mansour regarding the Fourier spectrum of polynomial size DNF formulas. Our concentration result has new implications in learning theory: it implies that the class of functions whose total influence is at most $K$ is agnostically learnable in time $2^{O(K\log K)}$, using membership queries.

cs.DM↗