SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2605.24944

Approximation algorithms for the prize-collecting rural postman problem

Abstract

In this paper, we study the prize-collecting rural postman problem (PCRPP), a variant of the rural postman problem. In an instance of the PCRPP, one is given an undirected graph whose edges have nonnegative lengths and nonnegative profits, together with a specified root vertex. The goal is to find a closed walk that starts and ends at the root vertex and minimizes the sum of the walk length and the profits of all edges that the walk does not traverse. A natural way to design an approximation algorithm for the PCRPP is to construct a prize-collecting traveling salesman problem (PCTSP) instance from the given PCRPP instance, apply an approximation algorithm to the PCTSP instance, and then convert the resulting solution to the PCTSP instance into a solution to the PCRPP instance. We show that this approach has an inherent factor-two barrier: even if the constructed PCTSP instance is solved exactly, the resulting solution to the PCRPP instance can have objective value arbitrarily close to twice the optimum value of the PCRPP instance. Our main result is a polynomial time approximation algorithm with an approximation ratio strictly smaller than 1.6 for the PCRPP. On a public benchmark set of 118 instances, the proposed algorithm has average and maximum optimality gaps of 3.39% and 12.12%, respectively.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hong Li, Jianping Li, Wei Li, Runtao Xie, Xiaoxiao Yang. 2026-05-24. Approximation algorithms for the prize-collecting rural postman problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24944

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS