arXiv · 2606.10156
$\tau$-Rec: A Verifiable Benchmark for Agentic Recommender Systems
Abstract
As recommender systems transition toward agentic, multi-turn conversational interfaces, evaluation paradigms have struggled to keep pace. Current benchmarks often rely on "LLM-as-a-judge" evaluations, which introduce subjectivity, high costs and inconsistency. We present $\tau$-Rec, a benchmark for agentic recommender systems that replaces subjective evaluation with verifiable rewards and a reveal-tagged elicitation (RTE) mechanism that controls how task constraints surface during dialogue. By testing agents against structured catalog predicates and employing a pass^k reliability metric, $\tau$-Rec provides a systematic test for consistent reasoning. Our evaluation of nine configurations across five model families -- GPT-5.4, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Gemini 2.5 Flash, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen3-32B and GPT-5 mini -- reveals a steep reliability cliff, where even the best model achieves only ~57% at pass^1 and ~35% at pass^4, highlighting a critical gap in current conversational agent deployment. All code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/nbharaths/tau-rec.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Bharath Sivaram Narasimhan, Karthik R Narasimhan. 2026-06-08. $\tau$-Rec: A Verifiable Benchmark for Agentic Recommender Systems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10156
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.