Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.16084

Rhythm of the Deep: Two-Tier Combinatorial Structure in Sperm Whale Codas Revealed by Acoustic Unit Induction

Mudit Sinha·Sanika Chavan
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Sperm-whale codas are conventionally described as recurring click-count and timing patterns. We show instead that their waveforms contain a two-tier combinatorial acoustic organization. Recurring click units combine with inter-click rhythm to form coda units, and recurring coda units exhibit additional sequence-level dependence under a different acoustic carrier. Using 1,483 recordings, eight families of frozen audio encoders induce click and coda inventories. Held-out transfer, matched nulls, destructive waveform counterfactuals, expert timing baselines, and explicit abstention separate supported structure from shared encoder shortcuts. Click-token composition predicts induced coda identity with a median normalized mutual-information lift of 0.380, including when events are detected without published click times or counts. Stable click order is weak, whereas rhythm predicts coda-representation distance after the exact click-token multiset is fixed. At the second tier, coda tokens show 0.132 bits of incremental lag-2 dependence under the prespecified categorical estimator. Two expert-inspired rhythm representations do not recover the positive component. Coda identity is also more tempo-stable than click identity. These results change the acoustic description of codas from a single prescribed rhythm inventory to layered waveform organization. The controlled-induction framework provides a general method for discovering and falsifying combinatorial structure in under-annotated audio.

Explore related subjects

cs.AIcs.CL

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mudit Sinha, Sanika Chavan. 2026-06-15. Rhythm of the Deep: Two-Tier Combinatorial Structure in Sperm Whale Codas Revealed by Acoustic Unit Induction. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.16084

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI↗