SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2606.31560

Directed Low Diameter Decomposition for Structured Digraphs

Abstract

Low diameter decompositions, or LDDs for short, are a fundamental primitive in the design of efficient graph algorithms. Roughly speaking, an LDD is a distribution over partitions of the vertices into bounded-diameter clusters such that nearby vertices are likely to be clustered together. Recently, there has been growing interest in lifting the notion of LDDs into \emph{directed graphs}. In particular, there are two natural directed analogues. The first is a directed LDD, where after removing a random subset of edges, every strongly connected component has a small diameter. The second is a quasipartition, which imposes the stronger requirement that whenever one vertex can still reach another after the edge removal, the two vertices must be close in the original directed metric. Every quasipartition yields an LDD, but the converse does not necessarily hold. In this work, we initiate the systematic study of LDDs in structured directed graphs. As our first main result, we show that any directed graph with pathwidth $\mathsf{pw}$ admits an $(O(\mathsf{pw}), \Delta)$-LDD. This improves upon the previous best-known $(2^{O(\mathsf{pw}^2)}, \Delta)$-LDD construction, which was implicitly derived from the quasipartition result of Salmasi, Sidiropoulos, and Sridhar [SODA'19]. As our second result, we show that the integrality gap of the Directed Non-Bipartite Sparsest-Cut LP relaxation on an $n$-vertex graph with treewidth $\mathsf{tw}$ is $O(\mathsf{tw} \log n)$. This improves upon the $O(\mathsf{tw}\log^2 n)$ bound of M\'emoli, Sidiropoulos, and Sridhar [ICALP'16, Algorithmica'18]. We obtain this result through the refined analysis of the quasipartition construction of M\'emoli et al. for bounded treewidth graphs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shinwoo An, Arnold Filtser. 2026-06-30. Directed Low Diameter Decomposition for Structured Digraphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.31560

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS