Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.12114

GaitSpan: Growing Humanoid Locomotion from Walking to Running

Kwan-Yee Lin·Zilin Wang·Janelle J. Liu·Stella X. Yu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A humanoid that can walk should not relearn locomotion from scratch to jog or run. Yet current approaches often obtain gait diversity by prescribing gait schedules, imitating motion clips, training experts to switch between or distilling skills into one policy. These strategies can produce impressive behaviors, but offer limited flexibility across continuous speed commands, terrains, and morphologies. We study skill growth with GaitSpan, a framework that expands a pretrained, basic walking policy into faster locomotion. It treats walking as a seed skill: reusable motor structure for balance, support, body coordination, and contact transition that can be regenerated at new rhythms, extended into longer/higher strides, and corrected by residual adaptation. This expansion has three aspects: 1) rhythm generation, which modulates the frozen walking policy with multiple internal clocks and learns command-conditioned combinations of the resulting canonical actions; 2) stride shaping, which rewards dynamic locomotion patterns appropriate for higher commanded speeds using a physically grounded objective inspired by spring-loaded inverted pendulum dynamics; and 3) residual adaptation, which captures motion details not accounted for by rhythm generation or stride shaping. GaitSpan is the first to deliver a single command-conditioned humanoid policy that spans walking, jogging, and running-like regimes covering a continuous speed range, transfers across morphologies, and deploys zero-shot on unseen sim-to-sim, and real-world terrains. Compared with baselines either trained with multi-experts or imitation from humans, it learns faster and achieves stronger gait performance.

Explore related subjects

cs.ROcs.AIcs.CV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kwan-Yee Lin, Zilin Wang, Janelle J. Liu, Stella X. Yu. 2026-07-13. GaitSpan: Growing Humanoid Locomotion from Walking to Running. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.12114

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO↗