SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.14274

Model Uncertainty under Non-Gaussian Errors: Bayesian Model Averaging and Selection in Stochastic Frontier Models

Abstract

The paper investigates Bayesian Model Averaging and Selection (BMA/S) under non-standard stochastic assumptions, focusing on stochastic frontier analysis (SFA). We propose fast, reliable procedures for inference in the normal-exponential stochastic frontier model and examine whether accounting for asymmetric disturbances affects model averaging and/or selection outcomes relative to the conventional Gaussian-error BMA/S. Particular attention is given to moderate-dimensional covariate selection problems typical in SFA applications. We demonstrate that, with appropriate search strategies and parallelization techniques, exhaustive model search can be computationally feasible and, in some cases, more practical than stochastic search alternatives. A Monte Carlo simulation study is used to compare the proposed SF-BMA/S procedure with standard Gaussian-error BMA/S under varying levels of inefficiency-to-noise ratio and signal strength with respect to the data generating process. The results show that accounting for stochastic frontier structures may affect posterior inference and model averaging outcomes, especially in scenarios where efficiency analysis is most sensible.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Kamil Makieła. 2026-07-15. Model Uncertainty under Non-Gaussian Errors: Bayesian Model Averaging and Selection in Stochastic Frontier Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14274

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM