SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.15737

NP-Hardness of Connected Components Reconfiguration under Component Jumping on Caterpillar Graphs

Abstract

We study the Connected Components Reconfiguration problem (CCR), in which connected components on a graph are transformed according to a specified reconfiguration rule. CCR generalizes Independent Set Reconfiguration by treating tokens not as individual vertices but as connected components of prescribed sizes. Among the variants of CCR, we focus on the component-jumping model, denoted by \CCRCJ. Nakahata.\ introduced this problem and showed that the decision problem for \CCRCJ~can be solved in $O(n^2)$ time on path graphs for arbitrary component sizes, and in polynomial time on chordal graphs when all connected components have the same size. However, the complexity on chordal graphs under a multiset size constraint remained open. In this paper, we study this multiset version of \CCRCJ~from both complexity-theoretic and algorithmic viewpoints. First, we prove that \CCRCJ~is NP-hard even on caterpillar graphs, which is a very restricted subclass of trees and chordal graphs minimally above path graphs. This result immediately implies NP-hardness for chordal graphs under a multiset size constraint, thereby resolving Nakahata's open problem on chordal graphs under multiset size constraints. Second, we revisit \CCRCJ~on path graphs. We improve the previous $O(n^2)$-time algorithm for the decision problem by giving an $O(n\log n)$-time decision algorithm. Moreover, when the instance has sufficiently large empty space, we show that there exists a reconfiguration sequence of length $O(n\log n)$, and such a sequence can be output efficiently.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Naoki Kitamura, Seitaro Kawaguchi, Yuya Terashima, Taisuke Izumi. 2026-07-17. NP-Hardness of Connected Components Reconfiguration under Component Jumping on Caterpillar Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.15737

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS