SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.20393

Near-Optimal Dimension Lower Bounds for Single-Vector Embeddings of Maximum Inner Product Similarity

Abstract

Multi-vector embeddings represent items by point clouds and compare query and document point clouds using Chamfer similarity, whereas single-vector embeddings use ordinary inner products. For singleton queries, Chamfer becomes maximum inner product similarity (MAX-IP). In our setting, MUVERA gives dimension $m^{O(1/\epsilon^2)}$ [DHJ+24], whereas the previous lower bound $(\epsilon^2m)^{\Omega(1/\epsilon)}$ [Jay26] left a gap between $1/\epsilon$ and $1/\epsilon^2$ in the exponent of $m$. We nearly close this gap. For every fixed $\delta\in(0,1)$, there are constants $A_\delta,c_\delta>0$ such that, for all sufficiently small $\epsilon>0$ and every $m\ge(1/\epsilon)^{A_\delta}$, there exist unit query vectors and document point clouds of at most $m$ unit vectors for which every single-vector approximation of all pairwise MAX-IP values to additive error $\epsilon$ has dimension \[ D \ge m^{c_\delta/\epsilon^{2-2\delta}}. \] This holds even for fully data-dependent representations chosen after seeing the dataset. It also applies to Chamfer because all queries are singletons. Since $\delta$ can be arbitrarily small, the exponent approaches the $O(1/\epsilon^2)$ dependence of the upper bound. The proof combines Sherstov's pattern matrix method with polynomial-size, constant-width DNF formulas computing functions of approximate degree $\Omega(k^{1-\delta})$. Uniform-width padding and a block encoding create an $\Omega(\epsilon)$ gap. A dummy coordinate then equalizes all false inputs, yielding a unit-sphere MAX-IP matrix that is an exact two-valued affine image of the DNF pattern matrix with gap at least $8\epsilon$. This allows the approximate-rank bound to apply. The proof was first obtained using a fully automated Gemini-based agentic system developed internally at Google. The authors have verified the proof and edited it for clarity of presentation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Rajesh Jayaram, Honghao Lin, Vahab Mirrokni, David P. Woodruff. 2026-07-22. Near-Optimal Dimension Lower Bounds for Single-Vector Embeddings of Maximum Inner Product Similarity. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.20393

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS