SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.23077

Structure over Depth: A Single-Block Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Multi-Entity Reasoning

Abstract

Modeling multi-entity temporal data requires capturing dependencies across entities, time, and their interactions. Transformer-based approaches perform well but often rely on deep stacks of layers to learn these heterogeneous dependencies implicitly, increasing computational cost. We revisit this problem from a structural perspective and decompose multi-entity temporal dynamics into three interaction types: spatial interactions among entities, temporal interactions across time, and cross interactions coupling the two domains. We propose a structured spatio-temporal transformer block that explicitly models all three within a single stage. It uses parallel spatial and temporal self-attention, followed by bidirectional cross-attention, and combines the outputs through learnable gated fusion. By directly encoding these complementary views, the model reduces the need for deep stacking. We evaluate the approach on video-based group activity recognition, skeleton-based human interaction analysis, and wearable sensor-based activity recognition. Despite its simplicity, the single structured Transformer block matches or outperforms deeper architectures with only 1.76M parameters. The results suggest that depth in prior models partly compensates for implicit and entangled interaction modeling, whereas explicit factorization offers a more efficient and transparent alternative. More broadly, this work supports a structure-first design principle: expressive multi-entity temporal reasoning can emerge by exposing interaction structure rather than relying on depth.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Narthana Sivalingam, Santhirarajah Sivasthigan, Buddhi Wijenayake, Roshan Godaliyadda, Vijitha Herath, Parakrama Ekanayake. 2026-07-25. Structure over Depth: A Single-Block Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Multi-Entity Reasoning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.23077

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI