Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.25254

Linear Programming Bounds for Fibered Sphere Packings

Andrew Salmon
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study linear programming (LP) bounds for sphere packings that fiber over translates of a fixed lattice of lower rank, as well as their dual formulations. In doing so, we place the work of Conway and Sloane on fibered packings in the context of linear programming bounds for packing problems on $\mathbb{R}^k \times A$, where $A$ is a compact abelian group. For these programs we prove that the primal and the dual both attain their optima, so that every instance has an optimal pair satisfying complementary slackness. We study cases in which the LP bounds considered here achieve the best known sphere packing densities in dimensions $\le 9$ with prescribed translational symmetry, recovering analogues of Propositions 2, 3, 5, and 8 of Conway and Sloane, and we show that the Barnes-Wall lattice achieves the optimal sphere packing density for any $16$-dimensional packing that fibers over translates of $E_8$. In dimension $6$, we show that the natural LP bound fibering over translates of $D_4$ is in fact equivalent to the LP bound in dimension $2$ for ordinary sphere packing, while the LP bound for $4$-dimensional packings that fiber over $A_2$ translates is implied by the LP bound in dimension $2$ but has additional rigid structure that may make it more tractable. Finally, using the discrete reduction framework of Li, we show that the linear programming bound for packings fibering over translates of $A_3$ is strictly above $1$, so the linear programming bound alone cannot prove Conjecture 4.1 of Cohn and Rajagopal.

Explore related subjects

math.MGmath.FAmath.OC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Andrew Salmon. 2026-07-28. Linear Programming Bounds for Fibered Sphere Packings. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.25254

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Tile sets consisting of two types of concave polygons derived from periodic tilings corresponding to non-periodic tilings with hat and turtle tiles

Using a convex pentagonal monotile belonging to the Type 5 family, we investigate the relationships among the hat tile, turtle tile, and Tile$(1, 1)$. By applying Sugimoto's Perspective and Amfirifma's Perspective, we obtain four types of concave polygons, AH-tile, BH-tile, AT-tile, and BT-tile, each having Heesch number 1 under the conditions considered. We show that these polygons correspond to clusters used to generate the non-periodic tilings $\mathscr{T}_h$ and $\mathscr{T}_s$. We further discuss the possibility that tile sets consisting of pairs selected from these polygons may correspond to $\textit{ASPmr}\{\text{A-tile}, \text{B-tile}\}$.

math.MG↗
arXiv2026

The mean distance to a simple closed curve on the sphere

Kimberling's Problem 10 asks for a simple closed curve of prescribed length $L$ (in particular, $L=4\pi$) on the unit sphere minimizing the mean geodesic distance $\mathcal{J}$ from a point of the sphere to the curve. For a positive integer $n$, put $\vartheta_{n}=\pi/(2n)$ and $L_{n}=2\pi/\sin\vartheta_{n}$. We show that the minimum of $\mathcal{J}$ over rectifiable simple closed curves of length at most $L_{n}$ equals $\vartheta_{n}-\tan(\vartheta_{n}/2)$, that it is attained only by curves of length exactly $L_{n}$, and that the sphere-filling ropes $\beta^{n,k}$ of Gerlach and von der Mosel attain it. Kimberling's case is $n=3$: at $L=4\pi$ the minimum is $\pi/6+\sqrt{3}-2=0.255649\ldots$, attained by an explicit six-arc curve and by its mirror image. For $L\le2\pi$ we determine $J(L)$, the infimum of $\mathcal{J}$ over curves of length $L$, exactly: it equals $\pi/2-L/(2\pi)$, attained precisely by the circles of length $L$. At the lengths $L_{n}$ we do not classify all minimizers, but show that every one of them bisects the sphere into two disks of area $2\pi$ and inradius $\vartheta_{n}$ whose inward collars have the largest possible area at every depth. The great circle is the only minimizer for $n=1$, and the $\beta^{n,k}$ are, up to congruence, the only ones of thickness at least $\sin\vartheta_{n}$. For arbitrary $L$ the function $J$ is nonincreasing, and together with the above this brackets it between two explicit values.

math.MG↗
arXiv2026

The topology of Gromov--Hausdorff space

We prove that the Gromov--Hausdorff space is homeomorphic to the Hilbert space. This paper is divided into four parts. In Part I, we construct an assignment of a full-support probability measure to every nonempty compact metric space that respects isometries and is continuous for simultaneous Hausdorff convergence of the spaces and weak convergence of the measures. In Part II, we use these measures to construct finite-dimensional local models whose induced pseudometrics approximate the original distances uniformly and whose norms and point maps vary continuously up to orthogonal changes of coordinates. In Part III, we use the local models to prove that the Gromov--Hausdorff space is an absolute retract for all metrizable spaces. In Part IV, we establish a discrete approximation property and conclude that the space of isometry classes of nonempty compact metric spaces is homeomorphic to the real separable infinite-dimensional Hilbert space.

math.MG↗