Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.25270

Where Steering Signals Come From: Activation Source Selection in Activation Steering

Jiaran Ye·Lingxu Ran·Zijun Yao·Chenpeng Wang·Yong Jiang·Lei Hou·Juanzi Li·Liangming Pan
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Activation steering controls language models by adding vectors or features to hidden states at inference time, but the upstream source of these steering signals is often treated as a secondary detail. We study this source choice as activation source selection: the combination of source context and activation readout policy used to collect the hidden states from which a steering signal is built. Holding the downstream intervention fixed, we show across three instruction-tuned models and four steering task families that changing only the source activations substantially changes steering success. We further find that effective steering is not explained simply by whether the desired behavior appears in the source text. Instead, strong signals come from execution-boundary states, where the model is about to produce or continue the target behavior. This pre-/post-realization distinction explains why answer-based sources sometimes work: their useful component aligns with execution-boundary directions rather than target appearance alone. Building on this view, we introduce tail subtraction, which removes shared prompt and continuation semantics from boundary states and yields cleaner, more stable steering signals. Overall, our results suggest that steering depends on representations of what the model is about to do, not merely on what has already appeared.

Explore related subjects

cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jiaran Ye, Lingxu Ran, Zijun Yao, Chenpeng Wang, Yong Jiang, Lei Hou, Juanzi Li, Liangming Pan. 2026-08-28. Where Steering Signals Come From: Activation Source Selection in Activation Steering. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.25270

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.AI subjectcs.CL subjectcs.LG subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related discoveries

arXiv2026

Language-Guided Tuning: Configuration Optimization for Automated ML Research

Configuration optimization remains a critical bottleneck in machine learning, requiring coordinated tuning across model architecture, training strategy, feature engineering, and hyperparameters. Traditional approaches treat these dimensions independently and lack interpretability, while recent automated methods struggle with dynamic adaptability and semantic reasoning about optimization decisions. We introduce Language-Guided Tuning (LGT), a framework that employs multi-agent Large Language Models to automatically optimize configurations through natural language reasoning. We apply textual feedback signals that complement numerical optimization by providing semantic understanding of training dynamics and configuration interdependencies. LGT coordinates three specialized agents: an Advisor that proposes configuration changes, an Evaluator that assesses progress, and an Optimizer that refines the decision-making process, creating a self-improving feedback loop. Through comprehensive evaluation on seven diverse datasets, LGT demonstrates substantial improvements over traditional optimization methods while maintaining high interpretability.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

G-Loss: Graph-Guided Fine-Tuning of Language Models

Traditional loss functions, including cross-entropy, contrastive, triplet, and su pervised contrastive losses, used for fine-tuning pre-trained language models such as BERT, operate only within local neighborhoods and fail to account for the global semantic structure. We present G-Loss, a graph-guided loss function that incorporates semi-supervised label propagation to use structural relationships within the embedding manifold. G-Loss builds a document-similarity graph that captures global semantic relationships, thereby guiding the model to learn more discriminative and robust embeddings. We evaluate G-Loss on five benchmark datasets covering key downstream classification tasks: MR (sentiment analysis), R8 and R52 (topic categorization), Ohsumed (medical document classification), and 20NG (news categorization). In the majority of experimental setups, G-Loss converges faster and produces semantically coherent embedding spaces, resulting in higher classification accuracy than models fine-tuned with traditional loss functions.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Stay Within Your Bounds: Distance-Guided Decoding for Guaranteed Context-Free Grammar Compliance

Grammar-constrained decoding helps large language models produce syntactically valid structured outputs, such as code, JSON, and SQL. For context-free grammars, many practical decoders enforce local prefix feasibility: each token must keep the current prefix extendable to some valid completion. Yet, under tokenizer-grammar mismatch and finite token budgets, feasible prefixes may still fail to reach acceptance. We propose a lookahead-guided decoding framework for context-free grammars based on pushdown automata. Offline, we compute bounded pushdown summaries with reachability labels and upper-bound distances to acceptance. Online, these estimates guide horizon-aware pruning and beam search. The resulting decoder is syntactically sound: every output is accepted by the target grammar. Experiments on JSON, SQL, and Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) show both consistent syntactic validity and improved completion quality over existing baselines.

cs.AI↗