arXiv · 2607.27039
Forcing and duality-corrected contracts for volatility control
Abstract
In this paper, we revisit the construction of optimal incentives in continuous-time principal-agent problems with drift and volatility control. Originally, a general approach relying on dynamic programming and second-order backward stochastic differential equations (2BSDEs) was developed by Cvitani\'c, Possama\"i, and Touzi (2018) [8] to determine the optimal form of contracts in this setting. More recently, Chiusolo and Hubert (2026) [5] proposed a BSDE-based approach by introducing an alternative `contractible-volatility' problem for the principal. In addition to the proposed new method, this work highlights that the optimality result of [8] actually hinges on an assumption, stated below as Assumption 2.3, which may not hold in general. Motivated by this, we introduce in this paper a more general class of contracts, parametrised by a function $\psi$ subject to conditions that make the contract revealing for the agent and without loss of generality for the principal. We further provide two natural specifications of $\psi$: one, inspired by the BSDE approach, yielding a forcing-type contract; the other, motivated by the 2BSDE approach, correcting the duality gap when Assumption 2.3 is not satisfied.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Alessandro Chiusolo, Emma Hubert, Dylan Possamaï, Nizar Touzi. 2026-07-29. Forcing and duality-corrected contracts for volatility control. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.27039
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.