Alessandro Chiusolo | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Forcing and duality-corrected contracts for volatility control

In this paper, we revisit the construction of optimal incentives in continuous-time principal-agent problems with drift and volatility control. Originally, a general approach relying on dynamic programming and second-order backward stochastic differential equations (2BSDEs) was developed by Cvitani\'c, Possama\"i, and Touzi (2018) [8] to determine the optimal form of contracts in this setting. More recently, Chiusolo and Hubert (2026) [5] proposed a BSDE-based approach by introducing an alternative `contractible-volatility' problem for the principal. In addition to the proposed new method, this work highlights that the optimality result of [8] actually hinges on an assumption, stated below as Assumption 2.3, which may not hold in general. Motivated by this, we introduce in this paper a more general class of contracts, parametrised by a function $\psi$ subject to conditions that make the contract revealing for the agent and without loss of generality for the principal. We further provide two natural specifications of $\psi$: one, inspired by the BSDE approach, yielding a forcing-type contract; the other, motivated by the 2BSDE approach, correcting the duality gap when Assumption 2.3 is not satisfied.

math.OC↗

arXiv2024

A new approach to principal-agent problems with volatility control

The recent work by Cvitani\'c, Possama\"i, and Touzi (2018) [9] presents a general approach for continuous-time principal-agent problems, through dynamic programming and second-order backward stochastic differential equations (BSDEs). In this paper, we provide an alternative formulation of the principal-agent problem, which can be solved simply by relying on the theory of BSDEs. This reformulation is strongly inspired by an important remark in [9], namely that if the principal observes the output process in continuous-time, she can compute its quadratic variation pathwise. While in [9], this information is used in the contract, our reformulation consists in assuming that the principal could directly control this process, in a `first-best' fashion. The resolution approach for this alternative problem actually follows the line of the so-called `Sannikov's trick' in the literature on continuous-time principal-agent problems, as originally introduced by Sannikov (2008) [28]. We then show that the solution to this `first-best' formulation is identical to the solution of the original problem. More precisely, using the contract form introduced in [9] as `penalisation contracts', we highlight that this `first-best' scenario can be achieved even if the principal cannot directly control the quadratic variation. Nevertheless, we do not have to rely on the theory of 2BSDEs to prove that such contracts are optimal, as their optimality is ensured by showing that the `first-best' scenario is achieved. We believe that this more straightforward approach to solve continuous-time principal-agent problems with volatility control will facilitate the dissemination of these problems across many fields, and its extension to even more intricate problems.

math.OC↗