SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.28391

TacWAM: Anchor-Guided World Action Model with Mechanics-Aware Tactile Prediction

Abstract

World Action Models (WAMs) combine future-state prediction with robot action generation, but existing approaches largely rely on visual futures. Visual prediction captures scene structure and object motion, yet provides limited supervision for force, deformation, shear, and slip during contact-rich manipulation. This creates two design requirements: tactile futures should carry meaningful physical information, and they should not become privileged cues for action generation. We present TacWAM, a mechanics-aware tactile WAM that addresses this challenge in three steps. First, a Spatially Aligned Fusion (SAF) Tactile Encoder maps tactile appearance, dense force fields, and deformation flow into a shared latent prediction space, with bilateral force and torque reconstruction preserving global contact information. Second, a tactile history encoder provides temporal context so future tactile prediction reflects how force and deformation change beyond the current tactile observation. Third, Anchor-Guided Tri-Modal (AGT) Attention separates current visual and tactile anchors, future prediction tokens, and action tokens, allowing future tactile states to supervise training without being directly read by the action branch. We evaluate TacWAM on four real-world contact-rich manipulation tasks covering fragile grasping, sustained surface contact, and dynamic in-hand manipulation. TacWAM achieves an average success rate of 75.0%, exceeding the strongest evaluated baseline by 37.5 percentage points. Staged ablations show consistent degradation when tactile history is removed and access to future prediction targets is relaxed. These results indicate that future tactile supervision can improve contact-aware action learning when combined with informative tactile representations and deployment-consistent information constraints.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lei Jin, Yiding Ma, Xin Zhang, Chen Gao, Wei Wu, Yong Li. 2026-07-30. TacWAM: Anchor-Guided World Action Model with Mechanics-Aware Tactile Prediction. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28391

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO