SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.06053

Breakdown Reliability for Saturated Fixed-Effect Inference

Abstract

Fixed-effect saturation does not itself distort conventional inference, but classical measurement error does. Under a local noise drift $\sigma_\nu^2=c^2/n$, the FE-OLS $t$-statistic converges to a non-central normal; saturation contributes a common $\sqrt{1-\rho}$ scaling rather than preferentially destroying signal or noise. Inverting the size distortion gives a Stock--Yogo-style critical value. Self-consistency of the within-reliability-corrected pilot yields a breakdown reliability $\lambda^{\dagger}=|t|/(|t|+\eta^{\dagger})$ --- the minimum within reliability at which conventional inference retains nominal size within the chosen tolerance --- computable from the reported $t$-statistic alone and algebraically $\rho$-free conditional on it; $\eta^{\dagger}\approx0.65$ at $5\%$ size and a 5-point tolerance. Replacing $|t|$ by $|t|+z_{1-\gamma_\beta}$ gives a certified breakdown reliability; with a lower-reliability bound whose coverage error is $\gamma_\lambda$, false certification is at most $\gamma_\beta+\gamma_\lambda$. Under a checkable projection-compatibility condition, a cluster-level score CLT and consistency of the Arellano variance estimator in the many-fixed-effect regime justify applying the same map to the reported cluster-robust $t$-statistic; clustering can reverse a verdict. In a saturated democracy--growth panel, aggregate V-Dem polyarchy is certified at $\gamma_\beta=0.05$, conditional on the supplied measurement model, while its judicial-constraints sub-index is flagged under i.i.d.\ and clustered standard errors. In a twin-pair wage design, the specification is flagged under both independent and correlated reporting-error models, although implied coverage of the nominal-$95\%$ interval ranges from $8\%$ to $68\%$. The diagnostic covers classical error in a continuous regressor, not binary-treatment misclassification.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Stanisław M. S. Halkiewicz. 2026-08-06. Breakdown Reliability for Saturated Fixed-Effect Inference. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06053

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM