arXiv · 2608.09188
When Cross-Venue Agreement Is Not Price Discovery: Disclosure Frontiers for 24/7 Equity-Perpetual Oracles
Abstract
Crypto-listed equity perpetuals trade while the primary cash market is closed, yet still need a mark for margin, funding, and liquidation. We model the closed-window mark as the fixed point of an oracle operator with two blocks: external anchoring and self/peer derivative reference. From marks and proxies alone the two are observationally equivalent: every reduced form admits infinitely many topology decompositions, and a path-law argument extends this to the full mark dynamics, so lead-lag and information-share estimators have power equal to size. Disclosure breaks the tie -- disclosed diagonal adjustment identifies the normalized topology, and disclosed support with forbidden anchors gives a row-level test that identifies, falsifies, or leaves a positive-dimensional class under a rank condition and finite-sample tolerance. Empirically, a disclosed OKX row survives pre-open falsification while a pure-external baseline shows the test's limited power, and an eight-week deep-closed panel with cash-reopen validation bounds the live-external content of closure variance. Cross-venue agreement is not price discovery unless disclosure or the cash reopen breaks the equivalence class.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Donghwa Seo, Doohwi Cha, Seunghan Son, Juyeong Lee, Minjae Lee, Minsuk Sung. 2026-08-10. When Cross-Venue Agreement Is Not Price Discovery: Disclosure Frontiers for 24/7 Equity-Perpetual Oracles. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.09188
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.