Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.12628

The Cost of Changing Edges for Diameter Computation and More

Sam Hiken·Yael Kirkpatrick·Jakob Nogler·Virginia Vassilevska Williams
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The sensitivity setting is a restricted setting for dynamic algorithms, particularly practical for scenarios where extensive preprocessing is feasible but responses to real-time modifications must be near-instantaneous before the data structure is eventually rebuilt. For graph problems, a sensitivity data structure is constructed with a preprocessing time P so that the following queries can be answered quickly, preferably in $O(1)$ time: given an edge $e$, return the answer to the problem on either $G \setminus e$ (decremental) or $G \cup e$ (incremental). In this paper, we almost entirely settle the decremental setting for the diameter and eccentricities problems in a variety of approximation regimes by matching P to the static runtime while supporting $O(1)$-time queries, thereby improving upon all previous results for a single failure [Bil\`o, Cohen, Friedrich, Schirneck, MFCS 2021; Bil\`o, Choudhary, Cohen, Friedrich, Krogmann, Schirneck, ICALP 2021]. More precisely: (1) We provide a tight reduction demonstrating that any exact distance sensitivity oracle can be used to efficiently solve decremental exact diameter and all-node eccentricities; (2) For the approximate setting, we match the runtime of all known static diameter algorithms across all sparsity settings, up to an additional $1+o(1)$ factor in approximation. Conversely, for the previously unexplored incremental setting of these problems: (3) We develop new lower bounds, demonstrating that no incremental algorithm can efficiently approximate diameter, radius, or eccentricity beyond a $5/3$ factor in undirected graphs or a $2$ factor in directed graphs; (4) We introduce two new instructive techniques and demonstrate how to utilize them to construct several new algorithms. Most notably, we develop incremental single-node eccentricity approximations for both directed and undirected graphs that match our new lower bounds.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sam Hiken, Yael Kirkpatrick, Jakob Nogler, Virginia Vassilevska Williams. 2026-08-12. The Cost of Changing Edges for Diameter Computation and More. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.12628

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗