arXiv subjects

Virginia Vassilevska Williams

Publications and source records attributed to Virginia Vassilevska Williams.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Truly Subquadratic 3SUM and Truly Subcubic APSP via Triangles in Sparse Lopsided Graphs

We give the first polynomial improvements over the textbook algorithms for $3$SUM and All-Pairs Shortest Paths (APSP): we show how to deterministically solve $3$SUM on $n$ integers of polynomial size in $O(n^{1.9992})$ time and APSP on directed $n$-vertex graphs with polynomially bounded integer weights in $O(n^{2.9995})$ time. This refutes the $3$SUM and APSP hypotheses. Using known reductions, we also refute the real-valued versions of the $3$SUM and APSP hypotheses, the Exact Triangle hypothesis, the Zero-Weight $k$-Clique hypotheses, and the three rectangular hinted Online Matrix--Vector conjectures of van den Brand, Nanongkai, and Saranurak, and we give polynomial speedups for a variety of other problems. All of these results follow from a single new algorithm for thin matrix products. Let $X$ be an $N\times D$ integer matrix and $Y$ a $D\times N$ integer matrix with $D\le N^{1/18}$, and let $W$ be any set of at most $N^2/\sqrt D$ positions. We compute the entries $(XY)[I,J]$, $(I,J)\in W$, in $O(N^2/D^{0.063})$ operations, which is polynomially less than the time needed to write down $XY$ or to compute $N^2/\sqrt D$ inner products one by one. We design this algorithm by modifying a variant of Coppersmith's rectangular matrix multiplication algorithm, built from a ten-multiplication identity of Schönhage, to perform only the operations needed for the entries in $W$, and show that few operations are needed. Interpreted as a graph algorithm, this solves the All-Edges Sparse Triangle problem in truly subquadratic time on sparse lopsided tripartite graphs where two parts have $n$ vertices but one part has $n^{\varepsilon}$ vertices for $\varepsilon<0.12$. By known reductions, Exact Triangle, and hence $3$SUM and APSP, reduce to this problem. We also give a data structure version that answers queries for single entries of $XY$, not known in advance.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

When Shall We $k$ Meet Again? Tight Algorithms for Diameter and Radius under the Meet Distance

Finding an optimal meeting point for a collection of agents on a directed graph is a classical problem studied in the context of network analysis, operations research and computational geometry. In this work, we use the two objectives of optimal meeting points examined in the literature to study two notions of meet-distance: $d^{\max}(u,v)$, the minimum over all meeting points $w$ of $\max(d(u,w), d(v,w))$; and $d^+(u,v)$, the minimum over all meeting points of $d(u,w) + d(v,w)$. These values measure the minimum time and minimum total distance required for two agents to meet. We initiate the fine-grained study of fundamental graph parameters under the two notions of meet-distance, namely the diameter, radius and eccentricities. For general directed graphs, we give an $\tilde{O}(m\sqrt{n})$ time algorithm for computing a 2-approximation to both notions of meet-diameter and show that this result is optimal under SETH. In contrast, we show that such a result is unattainable for the meet-radius as any finite approximation requires quadratic time under the Hitting Set Conjecture. For directed acyclic graphs, we obtain stronger results. We compute the meet$^{\max}$-diameter exactly in linear time and give a linear-time $2$-approximation for the meet$^{+}$-diameter. We complement the latter with a quadratic-time lower bound for any $(3/2-\varepsilon)$-approximation under SETH, yielding a separation between the two meet-distance objectives. Finally, we study the generalized meet-distance of $k$-tuples of vertices. For every positive integer $\ell$, we reduce the problem of $\ell$-approximating the $k$-point meet-diameter to computing an exact meet-diameter on smaller tuples, obtaining an $\ell$-approximation in time \[ O\!\left( mn+ \ell \left\lceil k^{1/\ell}\right\rceil n^{\left\lceil k^{1/\ell}\right\rceil+1} \right). \]

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

More Asymmetry Yields Faster Matrix Multiplication

We present a new improvement on the laser method for designing fast matrix multiplication algorithms. The new method further develops the recent advances by [Duan, Wu, Zhou FOCS 2023] and [Vassilevska Williams, Xu, Xu, Zhou SODA 2024]. Surprisingly the new improvement is achieved by incorporating more asymmetry in the analysis, circumventing a fundamental tool of prior work that requires two of the three dimensions to be treated identically. Together with recent advances in numerical optimization [Dupont et al. arXiv:2608.16884], the method yields a new bound on the square matrix multiplication exponent $ω<2.371177$, improved from the previous bound of $ω<2.371552$. We also improve the bounds of the exponents for multiplying rectangular matrices of various shapes.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

The Limits of Black-Box Reductions for All-Pairs Triangle Detection

For any tripartite relation $R\subseteq \mathbb{Z}^3$, the $R$-Triangle problem asks, given an edge-weighted graph, whether it contains a triangle whose weights form a triple in $R$. The All-Edge $R$-Triangle problem asks to determine for every edge whether it is contained in such a triangle. It is known that $R$-Triangle and All-Edge $R$-Triangle are subcubically fine-grained equivalent for every $R$ [Vassilevska W.-Williams'10]. However, while it is conjectured that these problems are tightly equivalent, this reduction only shows that if $R$-Triangle has an $O(n^{3-ε})$-time algorithm for some $ε>0$, then All-Edge $R$-Triangle has an $O(n^{3-ε/3})$-time algorithm. This paper provides a strong unconditional barrier to a tight equivalence: the reduction of [Vassilevska W.-Williams'10] is optimal for black-box reductions that work for arbitrary $R$. We give further results about black-box reductions between a variety of $R$-triangle problems. Our positive results yield new reductions between several classes of triangle and matrix problems --- for instance, we demonstrate that an $O(n^{2.53})$-time algorithm for computing equality or dominance product would imply an improvement on known algorithms for computing boolean $(\min, +)$-product, giving the first conditional lower bound for dominance and equality product. Our negative results can be thought of as barriers against natural fine-grained proof techniques. Besides the result that a tighter equivalence between $R$-Triangle and All-Edge $R$-Triangle is not possible, we also show that no appropriately "black-box" reductions are capable of demonstrating a subcubic equivalence between triangle counting and binary integer matrix multiplication, or a tight equivalence between boolean matrix multiplication and listing $n^2$ triangles, and more, despite the fact that all of these equivalences are conjectured to hold.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Improving the matrix multiplication exponent with modern optimization and AlphaEvolve

The current best bounds on the matrix multiplication exponent $ω$ are obtained through a refinement of the laser method called combination loss analysis (Duan et al., 2022; Williams et al., 2024; Alman et al., 2025). In this note, we address the optimization problem at the core of this approach and propose several improvements. First, we reformulate the optimization problem allowing us to solve it in a larger setting than was previously possible. Second, we leverage recent advances in machine learning to design a new optimization algorithm for this problem. Finally, we refine the resulting optimization algorithm with AlphaEvolve. Our combined approach yields an upper bound of $ω$ < 2.371177, improving the previous best bound of 2.371339.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

The Cost of Changing Edges for Diameter Computation and More

The sensitivity setting is a restricted setting for dynamic algorithms, particularly practical for scenarios where extensive preprocessing is feasible but responses to real-time modifications must be near-instantaneous before the data structure is eventually rebuilt. For graph problems, a sensitivity data structure is constructed with a preprocessing time P so that the following queries can be answered quickly, preferably in $O(1)$ time: given an edge $e$, return the answer to the problem on either $G \setminus e$ (decremental) or $G \cup e$ (incremental). In this paper, we almost entirely settle the decremental setting for the diameter and eccentricities problems in a variety of approximation regimes by matching P to the static runtime while supporting $O(1)$-time queries, thereby improving upon all previous results for a single failure [Bilò, Cohen, Friedrich, Schirneck, MFCS 2021; Bilò, Choudhary, Cohen, Friedrich, Krogmann, Schirneck, ICALP 2021]. More precisely: (1) We provide a tight reduction demonstrating that any exact distance sensitivity oracle can be used to efficiently solve decremental exact diameter and all-node eccentricities; (2) For the approximate setting, we match the runtime of all known static diameter algorithms across all sparsity settings, up to an additional $1+o(1)$ factor in approximation. Conversely, for the previously unexplored incremental setting of these problems: (3) We develop new lower bounds, demonstrating that no incremental algorithm can efficiently approximate diameter, radius, or eccentricity beyond a $5/3$ factor in undirected graphs or a $2$ factor in directed graphs; (4) We introduce two new instructive techniques and demonstrate how to utilize them to construct several new algorithms. Most notably, we develop incremental single-node eccentricity approximations for both directed and undirected graphs that match our new lower bounds.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Tighter bounds for weighted and unweighted shortest cycle approximation

We study the problem of approximating the length of a shortest cycle in a given graph, known as the girth of the graph. The state-of-the-art approximation algorithms for unweighted graphs by Kadria et al. [SODA'22] and Roditty and Trabelsi [arXiv'25] achieve the following trade-off: for every integer $k\geq 2$, there is an $\tilde{O}(n^{1+2/k})$ time algorithm that achieves a $(2k/3)$-approximation for the girth in unweighted $n$-node graphs. The first result of this paper is to achieve the same trade-off for $m$-edge, $n$-node graphs with non-negative real edge weights: a $2k/3$-approximation algorithm running in $\tilde{O}(m+n^{1+2/k})$ time. The dependence on $m$ is unavoidable in weighted graphs. Our result improves on the work of Kadria et al.~[SODA'23] and Ducoffe [ICALP'19 and SIDMA'21], who were only able to achieve such a trade-off for some values of $k$. We also prove new fine-grained lower bounds for girth approximation and related problems in unweighted graphs.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Improved Approximation Algorithms for n-Pairs Shortest Paths

Let $G = (V, E)$ be a graph with $n = |V|$ nodes and $m = |E|$ edges. The $t$-Pairs Shortest Paths problem, introduced by Cohen [FOCS'93; SICOMP'99], asks to approximate the distances between $t$ prespecified pairs of vertices. Recently, this problem has received renewed attention, particularly in the case where $t = Θ(n)$: the $n$-Pairs Shortest Paths problem. In this setting, new algorithms and conditional lower bounds have been developed by Dalirrooyfard, Jin, Vassilevska Williams, and Wein [FOCS'22], and Chechik, Hoch, and Lifshitz [SODA'25]. In this paper, we present the first algorithm for the $n$-Pairs Shortest Paths problem in \textit{weighted} undirected graphs that achieves a $(2 - α)k$-approximation, for constant $α> 0$, that runs in $\tilde{O}(mn^{1/k} + n^{1 + 2/k})$ time. Specifically, we present a $1.622k$-approximation, improving upon the $(2k - 3)$-approximation of Chechik, Hoch, and Lifshitz [SODA'25] for graphs that are not super sparse, which answers in the affirmative the open question posed by them. We also develop improved approximation algorithms with better tradeoffs for unweighted graphs and dense weighted graphs that improve upon the results of Dalirrooyfard \etal~and Chechik, Hoch, and Lifshitz. Our main technical contribution is the new \textit{heavy-edge} technique. Using this technique, we transform an algorithm with an approximation guarantee that depends on $W_{uv}$, the weight of the heaviest edge on the shortest path between $u$ and $v$, into an algorithm with purely multiplicative approximation that does not depend on $W_{uv}$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Undirected Replacement Paths: Dual Fault Reduces to Single Source

Given a graph and two fixed vertices $s$ and $t$, the Replacement Path Problem (RP) is to compute for every edge $e$, the distance between $s$ and $t$ when $e$ is removed. There are two natural extensions to RP: (1) Single Source Replacement Paths (SSRP): Given a graph $G$ and a source node $s$, compute for every vertex $v$ and every edge $e$ the $s$-$v$ distance in $G \setminus \{e\}$. That is, we do not fix the target anymore. (2) $2$-Fault Replacement Paths (2-FRP): Given a graph $G$ and two nodes $s$ and $t$, compute for every pair of edges $e, e'$ the $s$-$t$ distance in $G \setminus \{e, e'\}$. That is, we consider two failures instead of one. Previously, there was no known reduction between SSRP and 2-FRP. It seemed plausible that 2-FRP would be computationally harder because there are no settings where 2-FRP admits a faster algorithm than SSRP. In directed unweighted graphs there is a provable gap in complexity, and in undirected graphs many of the known 2-FRP algorithms in a variety of settings are much slower than those for SSRP in the same setting. The main contribution of this paper is a tight reduction from undirected $2$-FRP to undirected SSRP, showing that contrary to prior intuition, 2-FRP is not harder than SSRP. As our reduction is weight-preserving, we obtain the first algorithms for $2$-FRP that match the best-known runtimes for SSRP: (1) $\tilde{O}(M n^ω)$ for weights in $[1, M]$ [GVW19], improving upon $O(Mn^{2.87})$ [CZ24]; (2) $n^3/2^{Ω(\sqrt{\log n})}$ for weights in $[1, \text{poly}(n)]$ [GVW19], improving over the previous $n^3\text{polylog}(n)$ running time [VWWX22]; (3) $\tilde{O}(mn^{1/2}+n^{2})$ combinatorial time for unweighted graphs [CC19], and more generally for rational weights in $[1, 2]$ [CM20], improving upon $\tilde{O}(n^{3-1/18})$ [CZ24]. We complement these upper bounds with tight lower bounds under fine-grained hypotheses.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

New Diameter Approximations via Distance Oracle Techniques

Computing the diameter of a graph is a problem of great interest both in general algorithms research and specifically within fine-grained complexity, where it is a cornerstone hard problem. Recent work has achieved a full conditional lower bound tradeoff curve for both directed and undirected graphs. However, the best known upper bounds do not match the lower bounds. In particular, the best known approximation scheme for undirected graph diameter has not been improved. Moreover, this scheme is randomized and no similar deterministic scheme is known. Another fundamental field of research in shortest paths computation is the construction of approximate distance oracles. Thorup and Zwick [JACM'05] provided the first such distance oracle with constant query time and (conditionally) optimal space, and in the years since many advances have led to a vast toolbox of techniques and data structures. These two areas of research seem natural to combine since they both concern approximating shortest paths. However, the known diameter approximation algorithms only use a small subset of the techniques used in distance oracles research. In this work we show that in fact approximate diameter and distance oracles are intricately connected. We first demonstrate a strong connection between the current best known diameter approximation scheme of Cairo, Grossi and Rizzi ("CGR") and the $(2k-1)$-approximate distance oracle of Thorup and Zwick. This allows us to derandomize the CGR algorithm and obtain the first deterministic diameter approximation tradeoff. We further derandomize other central techniques in the field of distance oracles and use them to achieve new deterministic diameter approximation algorithms. Finally, we show how these new techniques can be used to derandomize many current best known results in various fields of shortest paths approximations.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Preprocessed 3SUM for Unknown Universes with Subquadratic Space

We consider the classic 3SUM problem: given sets of integers $A, B, C $, determine whether there is a tuple $(a, b, c) \in A \times B \times C$ satisfying $a + b + c = 0$. The 3SUM Hypothesis, central in fine-grained complexity, states that there does not exist a truly subquadratic time 3SUM algorithm. Given this long-standing barrier, recent work over the past decade has explored 3SUM from a data structural perspective. Specifically, in the 3SUM in preprocessed universes regime, we are tasked with preprocessing sets $A, B$ of size $n$, to create a space-efficient data structure that can quickly answer queries, each of which is a 3SUM problem of the form $A', B', C'$, where $A' \subseteq A$ and $B' \subseteq B$. A series of results have achieved $\tilde{O}(n^2)$ preprocessing time, $\tilde{O}(n^2)$ space, and query time improving progressively from $\tilde{O}(n^{1.9})$ [CL15] to $\tilde{O}(n^{11/6})$ [CVX23] to $\tilde{O}(n^{1.5})$ [KPS25]. Given these series of works improving query time, a natural open question has emerged: can one achieve both truly subquadratic space and truly subquadratic query time for 3SUM in preprocessed universes? We resolve this question affirmatively, presenting a tradeoff curve between query and space complexity. Specifically, we present a simple randomized algorithm achieving $\tilde{O}(n^{1.5 + \varepsilon})$ query time and $\tilde{O}(n^{2 - 2\varepsilon/3})$ space complexity. Furthermore, our algorithm has $\tilde{O}(n^2)$ preprocessing time, matching past work. Notably, quadratic preprocessing is likely necessary for our tradeoff as either the preprocessing or the query time must be at least $n^{2-o(1)}$ under the 3SUM Hypothesis.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Improved Additive Approximation Algorithms for APSP

The All-Pairs Shortest Paths (APSP) is a foundational problem in theoretical computer science. Approximating APSP in undirected unweighted graphs has been studied for many years, beginning with the work of Dor, Halperin and Zwick [SICOMP'01]. Many recent works have attempted to improve these original algorithms using the algebraic tools of fast matrix multiplication. We improve on these results for the following problems. For $+2$-approximate APSP, the state-of-the-art algorithm runs in $O(n^{2.259})$ time [Dürr, IPL 2023; Deng, Kirkpatrick, Rong, Vassilevska Williams, and Zhong, ICALP 2022]. We give an improved algorithm in $O(n^{2.2255})$ time. For $+4$ and $+6$-approximate APSP, we achieve time complexities $O(n^{2.1462})$ and $O(n^{2.1026})$ respectively, improving the previous $O(n^{2.155})$ and $O(n^{2.103})$ achieved by [Saha and Ye, SODA 2024]. In contrast to previous works, we do not use the big hammer of bounded-difference $(\min,+)$-product algorithms. Instead, our algorithms are based on a simple technique that decomposes the input graph into a small number of clusters of constant diameter and a remainder of low degree vertices, which could be of independent interest in the study of shortest paths problems. We then use only standard fast matrix multiplication to obtain our improvements.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Improved girth approximation in weighted undirected graphs

Let $G = (V,E,\ell)$ be a $n$-node $m$-edge weighted undirected graph, where $\ell: E \rightarrow (0,\infty)$ is a real \emph{length} function defined on its edges, and let $g$ denote the girth of $G$, i.e., the length of its shortest cycle. We present an algorithm that, for any input, integer $k \geq 1$, in $O(kn^{1+1/k}\log{n} + m(k+\log{n}))$ expected time finds a cycle of length at most $\frac{4k}{3}g$. This algorithm nearly matches a $O(n^{1+1/k}\log{n})$-time algorithm of \cite{KadriaRSWZ22} which applied to unweighted graphs of girth $3$. For weighted graphs, this result also improves upon the previous state-of-the-art algorithm that in $O((n^{1+1/k}\log n+m)\log (nM))$ time, where $\ell: E \rightarrow [1, M]$ is an integral length function, finds a cycle of length at most $2kg$~\cite{KadriaRSWZ22}. For $k=1$ this result improves upon the result of Roditty and Tov~\cite{RodittyT13}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Shortest Paths in Multimode Graphs

In this work we study shortest path problems in multimode graphs, a generalization of the min-distance measure introduced by Abboud, Vassilevska W. and Wang in [SODA'16]. A multimode shortest path is the shortest path using one of multiple `modes' of transportation that cannot be combined. This represents real-world scenarios where different modes are not combinable, such as flights operated by different airlines. More precisely, a $k$-multimode graph is a collection of $k$ graphs on the same vertex set and the $k$-mode distance between two vertices is defined as the minimum among the distances computed in each individual graph. We focus on approximating fundamental graph parameters on these graphs, specifically diameter and radius. In undirected multimode graphs we first show an elegant linear time 3-approximation algorithm for 2-mode diameter. We then extend this idea into a general subroutine that can be used as a part of any $α$-approximation, and use it to construct a 2 and 2.5 approximation algorithm for 2-mode diameter. For undirected radius, we introduce a general scheme that can compute a 3-approximation of the $k$-mode radius for any $k$. In the directed case we develop novel techniques to construct a linear time algorithm to determine whether the diameter is finite. We also develop many conditional fine-grained lower bounds for various multimode diameter and radius approximation problems. We are able to show that many of our algorithms are tight under popular fine-grained complexity hypotheses, including our linear time 3-approximation for $3$-mode undirected diameter and radius. As part of this effort we propose the first extension to the Hitting Set Hypothesis [SODA'16], which we call the $\ell$-Hitting Set Hypothesis. We use this hypothesis to prove the first parameterized lower bound tradeoff for radius approximation algorithms.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

All-Pairs Shortest Paths with Few Weights per Node

We study the central All-Pairs Shortest Paths (APSP) problem under the restriction that there are at most $d$ distinct weights on the outgoing edges from every node. For $d=n$ this is the classical (unrestricted) APSP problem that is hypothesized to require cubic time $n^{3-o(1)}$, and at the other extreme, for $d=1$, it is equivalent to the Node-Weighted APSP problem. We present new algorithms that achieve the following results: 1. Node-Weighted APSP can be solved in time $\tilde{O}(n^{(3+ω)/2}) = \tilde{O}(n^{2.686})$, improving on the 15-year-old subcubic bounds $\tilde{O}(n^{(9+ω)/4}) = \tilde{O}(n^{2.843})$ [Chan; STOC '07] and $\tilde{O}(n^{2.830})$ [Yuster; SODA '09]. This positively resolves the question of whether Node-Weighted APSP is an ``intermediate'' problem in the sense of having complexity $n^{2.5+o(1)}$ if $ω=2$, in which case it also matches an $n^{2.5-o(1)}$ conditional lower bound. 2. For up to $d \leq n^{3-ω-ε}$ distinct weights per node (where $ε> 0$), the problem can be solved in subcubic time $O(n^{3-f(ε)})$ (where $f(ε) > 0$). In particular, assuming that $ω= 2$, we can tolerate any sublinear number of distinct weights per node $d \leq n^{1-ε}$, whereas previous work [Yuster; SODA '09] could only handle $d \leq n^{1/2-ε}$ in subcubic time. This promotes our understanding of the APSP hypothesis showing that the hardest instances must exhaust a linear number of weights per node. Our result also applies to the All-Pairs Exact Triangle problem, thus generalizing a result of Chan and Lewenstein on "Clustered 3SUM" from arrays to matrices. Notably, our technique constitutes a rare application of additive combinatorics in graph algorithms.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Faster Weighted and Unweighted Tree Edit Distance and APSP Equivalence

The tree edit distance (TED) between two rooted ordered trees with $n$ nodes labeled from an alphabet $Σ$ is the minimum cost of transforming one tree into the other by a sequence of valid operations consisting of insertions, deletions and relabeling of nodes. The tree edit distance is a well-known generalization of string edit distance and has been studied since the 1970s. Years of steady improvements have led to an $O(n^3)$ algorithm [DMRW 2010]. Fine-grained complexity casts light onto the hardness of TED showing that a truly subcubic time algorithm for TED implies a truly subcubic time algorithm for All-Pairs Shortest Paths (APSP) [BGMW 2020]. Therefore, under the popular APSP hypothesis, a truly subcubic time algorithm for TED cannot exist. However, unlike many problems in fine-grained complexity for which conditional hardness based on APSP also comes with equivalence to APSP, whether TED can be reduced to APSP has remained unknown. In this paper, we resolve this. Not only we show that TED is fine-grained equivalent to APSP, our reduction is tight enough, so that combined with the fastest APSP algorithm to-date [Williams 2018] it gives the first ever subcubic time algorithm for TED running in $n^3/2^{Ω(\sqrt{\log{n}})}$ time. We also consider the unweighted tree edit distance problem in which the cost of each edit is one. For unweighted TED, a truly subcubic algorithm is known due to Mao [Mao 2022], later improved slightly by Dürr [Dürr 2023] to run in $O(n^{2.9148})$. Their algorithm uses bounded monotone min-plus product as a crucial subroutine, and the best running time for this product is $\tilde{O}(n^{\frac{3+ω}{2}})\leq O(n^{2.6857})$ (where $ω$ is the exponent of fast matrix multiplication). In this work, we close this gap and give an algorithm for unweighted TED that runs in $\tilde{O}(n^{\frac{3+ω}{2}})$ time.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Output-sensitive approximate counting via a measure-bounded hyperedge oracle, or: How asymmetry helps estimate $k$-clique counts faster

Dell, Lapinskas and Meeks [DLM SICOMP 2022] presented a general reduction from approximate counting to decision for a class of fine-grained problems that can be viewed as hyperedge counting or detection problems in an implicit hypergraph, thus obtaining tight equivalences between approximate counting and decision for many key problems such as $k$-clique, $k$-sum and more. Their result is a reduction from approximately counting the number of hyperedges in an implicit $k$-partite hypergraph to a polylogarithmic number of calls to a hyperedge oracle that returns whether a given subhypergraph contains an edge. The main result of this paper is a generalization of the DLM result for {\em output-sensitive} approximate counting, where the running time of the desired counting algorithm is inversely proportional to the number of witnesses. Our theorem is a reduction from approximately counting the (unknown) number of hyperedges in an implicit $k$-partite hypergraph to a polylogarithmic number of calls to a hyperedge oracle called only on subhypergraphs with a small ``measure''. If a subhypergraph has $u_i$ nodes in the $i$th node partition of the $k$-partite hypergraph, then its measure is $\prod_i u_i$. Using the new general reduction and by efficiently implementing measure-bounded colorful independence oracles, we obtain new improved output-sensitive approximate counting algorithms for $k$-clique, $k$-dominating set and $k$-sum. In graphs with $n^t$ $k$-cliques, for instance, our algorithm $(1\pm ε)$-approximates the $k$-clique count in time $$\tilde{O}_ε(n^{ω(\frac{k-t-1}{3},\frac{k-t}{3},\frac{k-t+2}{3}) }+n^2),$$ where $ω(a,b,c)$ is the exponent of $n^a\times n^b$ by $n^b\times n^c$ matrix multiplication. For large $k$ and $t>2$, this is a substantial improvement over prior work, even if $ω=2$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Average-Case Hardness of Parity Problems: Orthogonal Vectors, k-SUM and More

This work establishes conditional lower bounds for average-case {\em parity}-counting versions of the problems $k$-XOR, $k$-SUM, and $k$-OV. The main contribution is a set of self-reductions for the problems, providing the first specific distributions, for which: $\mathsf{parity}\text{-}k\text{-}OV$ is $n^{Ω(\sqrt{k})}$ average-case hard, under the $k$-OV hypothesis (and hence under SETH), $\mathsf{parity}\text{-}k\text{-}SUM$ is $n^{Ω(\sqrt{k})}$ average-case hard, under the $k$-SUM hypothesis, and $\mathsf{parity}\text{-}k\text{-}XOR$ is $n^{Ω(\sqrt{k})}$ average-case hard, under the $k$-XOR hypothesis. Under the very believable hypothesis that at least one of the $k$-OV, $k$-SUM, $k$-XOR or $k$-Clique hypotheses is true, we show that parity-$k$-XOR, parity-$k$-SUM, and parity-$k$-OV all require at least $n^{Ω(k^{1/3})}$ (and sometimes even more) time on average (for specific distributions). To achieve these results, we present a novel and improved framework for worst-case to average-case fine-grained reductions, building on the work of Dalirooyfard, Lincoln, and Vassilevska Williams, FOCS 2020.

cs.CC↗