arXiv · 2608.22713
A Source-Grounded Framework for Constructing and Evaluating Progressive Multimodal Diagnostic Dialogues from Clinical Case Reports
Abstract
Clinical diagnosis requires progressive integration of patient history, physical examination, laboratory findings, medical images, and diagnostic-informative tests. However, most multimodal medical benchmarks evaluate fixed inputs or endpoint answers, while fully interactive diagnostic agents conflate evidence selection with evidence interpretation. We present a source-grounded framework to construct progressive multimodal diagnostic dialogues from case reports and an evaluation strategy for assessing MLLMs on final diagnosis, diagnostic reasoning, and image-finding interpretation. Evaluation on 24 internal medicine case reports showed that our framework can accurately convert case reports into reference dialogues, achieving a diagnosis F1 of 0.99 and a reasoning-quality score of 4.79 out of 5. Evaluation on two frontier MLLMs (o4-mini and Claude Haiku 4.5) achieved reasoning-quality scores of 2.75 and 2.50, respectively, with substantially lower diagnosis, reasoning, and image-finding F1 scores. The results demonstrate that fluent responses do not necessarily reflect evidence-grounded clinical reasoning and highlight the utility of the proposed framework for evaluating multimodal diagnostic reasoning.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Yufan Wang, Rui Yang, Yi Liu, Yi Lin, Yifan Peng. 2026-08-24. A Source-Grounded Framework for Constructing and Evaluating Progressive Multimodal Diagnostic Dialogues from Clinical Case Reports. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.22713
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.