Not All Degree Constraints Are Created Equal when Computing Spanning Trees

Narek Bojikian; Alexander Firbas; Robert Ganian; Hung P. Hoang; Krisztina Szilagyi

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.25530

Not All Degree Constraints Are Created Equal when Computing Spanning Trees

Narek Bojikian·Alexander Firbas·Robert Ganian·Hung P. Hoang·Krisztina Szilagyi

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study the computation of minimum spanning trees subject to local degree constraints. Recent work (ICALP 2026) established that three natural formalizations of this problem share the exact same parameterized complexity under standard structural graph parameters, including treewidth, pathwidth and clique-width. This applies to the cases where every vertex has a single target degree (Specified Degree MST), or a degree upper bound (Bounded Degree MST), or is equipped with a set of admissible degrees (Set of Degrees MST). In this paper, we investigate these problems under more restrictive parameterizations and reveal that their complexity landscapes fundamentally diverge on bounded-treedepth graphs. Specifically, we prove that the former two problems are fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the treedepth of the input graph. In sharp contrast, we show that Set of Degrees MST remains W[1]-hard parameterized by treedepth, even when combined with the feedback vertex number (i.e., deletion distance to treewidth $1$). Finally, we show that this divergence seems to be specific to treedepth: we exclude an analogous W[1]-hardness result for Set of Degrees MST w.r.t. the vertex cover number and also rule out fixed-parameter algorithms for the former two problems w.r.t. deletion distance to constant pathwidth.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Narek Bojikian, Alexander Firbas, Robert Ganian, Hung P. Hoang, Krisztina Szilagyi. 2026-08-26. Not All Degree Constraints Are Created Equal when Computing Spanning Trees. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.25530

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗