SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.27096

Product Structure Meets Track Layouts

Abstract

A track layout of a graph is a partition of its vertices into linearly ordered independent sets, called tracks, such that no two edges between the same pair of tracks cross. Given a graph, the goal in this context is to determine its track number, that is, the minimum number of tracks required for the graph to admit a track layout. In this work, we present upper bounds on the track number of graphs admitting a product structure. Our main contribution is an algorithm that computes a track layout with at most $(2h+1) \cdot r \cdot tn(H)$ tracks for every subgraph of the strong product $P^h \boxtimes K_r \boxtimes H$, where $P^h$ is the $h$-th power of a path $P$, $K_r$ is the complete graph on $r$ vertices, and $H$ is a graph with track number $tn(H)$. Combined with existing product-structure results from the literature, this algorithm yields upper bounds on the track number of several graph classes. For planar graphs, the obtained bound matches the current best-known upper bound of $225$. For $1$-planar and optimal $2$-planar graphs, our algorithm yields track layouts with at most $375$ tracks, while for genus-$k$, $k$-planar, $k$-framed, $k$-map, and $k$-string graphs it provides track layouts with a number of tracks that depends solely on $k$, thus establishing new upper bounds on the track number for these graph classes. The algorithm runs in linear time for planar graphs and, more generally, in $O(n + h \cdot r \cdot t + f_t(H))$ time whenever a corresponding product-structure decomposition of the input $n$-vertex graph is provided as part of the input, where $t=tn(H)$ and $f_t(H)$ is the time needed to compute a $t$-track layout of $H$. Furthermore, our algorithm only uses elementary linked-list data structures.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Michael A. Bekos, Giordano Da Lozzo, Petr Hliněný, Michael Kaufmann. 2026-08-27. Product Structure Meets Track Layouts. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27096

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS