SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.27114

Quadratic Complexity of Voronoi Diagrams in $\mathbb{R}^3$ for Lines in a Single Ruling of a Regulus

Abstract

We study nearest and farthest Voronoi diagrams of lines in $\mathbb{R}^3$ under the Euclidean metric when all $n$ lines belong to one ruling of a smooth doubly ruled real quadric. For arbitrary line sites, the combinatorial complexity of the nearest Voronoi diagram is known only to lie between $\Omega(n^2)$ and $O(n^{3+\varepsilon})$. Under general-position assumptions, we prove that both diagrams in the ruling class have at most $4n(n-3)$ vertices and $O(n^2)$ total combinatorial complexity. Conversely, for every $n \ge 4$, one ruling of a fixed non-rotational one-sheeted hyperboloid contains a general-position set of $n$ lines with at least $(n-2)(n-3)/2$ distinct regular nearest vertices, where regular means that exactly four lines support the vertex and their three defining bisectors meet transversely. Thus the worst-case complexity of the nearest Voronoi diagram in this class is $\Theta(n^2)$, while the farthest diagram has $\Theta(n^2)$ complexity for every general-position input, since it has exactly $n(n-1)$ three-dimensional cells. Under the Pl\"ucker embedding, the ruling is a conic, and the condition for a line to be tangent to a Euclidean sphere restricts to a binary quartic. At a regular vertex, the four supporting parameters exhaust its roots, and sign alternation forces two arcs of the parameter circle to be site-free. This leaves only $n(n-3)/2$ possible cyclic support types, while B\'ezout's theorem bounds the number of centers for each type by eight. The same reduction yields an exact $O(n^2)$-time algorithm that, after cyclically sorting the site parameters, enumerates all finite nearest and farthest vertices as constant-degree real univariate representations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Eunku Park. 2026-08-27. Quadratic Complexity of Voronoi Diagrams in $\mathbb{R}^3$ for Lines in a Single Ruling of a Regulus. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27114

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG