Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.29834

You Know What I Mean: A Benchmark for Agentic Conversational Reference Grounding

Karen Fuchs·Uri Katz·Yoav Goldberg
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Collaborative conversations frequently contain references whose targets are indirect rather than named: resolving "this looks like the fix discussed yesterday" requires combining conversational context with evidence from the surrounding workspace which is accessible through APIs or user interfaces. We formalize this problem as Conversational Reference Grounding (CoRG): using a given set of tools to resolve a reference in conversation to the unique external item intended by the speaker. CoRG is challenging because it combines lexical, semantic, and temporal cues distributed across the conversation and the external workspace. Agents must translate these heterogeneous signals into effective tool use: formulating strategies, discovering plausible candidates, inspecting their metadata and content, and ruling out close alternatives. We study CoRG through RepoRef, a benchmark of 400 developer-chat segments grounded in GitHub issues, pull requests, and commits across 92 repositories. Unlike single-shot retrieval tasks, RepoRef often requires multi-step tool use. Our results show that CoRG remains challenging for current agents, even the best agent reaches only 67.0% success rate, leaving one third of references unresolved. These findings position CoRG as a concrete benchmark for studying how agents search, inspect, and verify information in realistic multi-tool environments.

Explore related subjects

cs.CLcs.IR

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Karen Fuchs, Uri Katz, Yoav Goldberg. 2026-08-30. You Know What I Mean: A Benchmark for Agentic Conversational Reference Grounding. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.29834

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.CL subjectcs.IR subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related discoveries

arXiv2026

Beyond Polarization: The Generative Constraint of Chain-of-Thought in Pointwise Reranking

In pointwise document reranking, Chain-of-Thought models typically underperform direct scoring models. While existing diagnostics attribute this to inferior classification, score polarization, or calibration breakdown, whether targeted training can bridge this gap remains unclear. Our empirical study first confirms that this gap is stable across scales up to 32B parameters, ruling out model and data capacity confounders. We then apply stress tests utilizing reinforcement learning, fine-grained supervision, and architectural decoupling to explicitly repair these deviations. Although these interventions improve classification accuracy and absolute scores, the relative ranking gap persists. These findings suggest that, within the pointwise scoring paradigm, routing continuous relevance semantics through discrete text constrains ranking signal resolution, revealing a bottleneck that is stable and difficult to overcome under current standard methods, rather than an easily resolvable training bias.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Search, Inspect, Fetch: Exploiting Structure-Aware Boolean Retrieval for Deep-Search Agents

Existing deep-search agents use a Search-Visit workflow that retrieves whole webpages without considering the structure they expose through titles, headings, sections, and metadata. This prevents agents from directly constraining retrieval to parts of a webpage and often carries irrelevant content into their context. We introduce Sieve, a search-inspect-fetch strategy driven by a Boolean Query Language (BQL): it searches webpage fields to filter candidates, uses an interchangeable ranker to order them, presents structure-rich result cards for inspection, and fetches only selected sections. Across three QA collections, Sieve is more accurate than the strongest conventional Search-Visit configuration on each collection while using 20.7-50.6% fewer tokens. Boolean filtering improves every tested ranker, and the accuracy-context advantage persists across retriever choices and agent backbones. Our implementation is included in the SkimSearchAgent library https://github.com/ielab/skim-search-agent.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

HintEval: An Open-Source Python Toolkit for Hint Generation and Hint Evaluation

Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly provide direct answers to user questions, raising concerns about reduced engagement in critical thinking and problem-solving. Hint generation offers an alternative by guiding users toward answers without revealing them, while hint evaluation assesses the quality of such guidance. Research in this area is hindered by fragmented datasets, inconsistent annotation formats, and evaluation tools that are often dataset-specific or unavailable. To address these challenges, we introduce HintEval, an open-source Python library for unified hint generation and evaluation. HintEval standardizes access to diverse hint datasets, supports answer-aware and answer-agnostic generation methods, and implements multiple evaluation metrics within a shared data model. The toolkit enables reproducible experimentation, cross-dataset analysis, and multi-dimensional evaluation with minimal engineering effort. We further demonstrate its utility through human studies in which participants assess generated hints and use them to answer questions, showing that hints can effectively support users in reaching correct answers. HintEval is accompanied by comprehensive documentation, an executable Google Colab notebook for rapid experimentation, and a demonstration video. By promoting consistent evaluation practices and lowering barriers to entry, it facilitates systematic research on hint-based question answering (QA) in NLP and IR.

cs.CL↗