SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2609.02282

RouteGraph-Mona: Confusion-Aware Routing Fine-Tuning for Mineral Image Classification

Abstract

Mineral image classification is important for geological exploration and resource development, but it remains challenging due to substantial intra-class variations in appearance and high inter-class visual similarity. Multi-cognitive Visual Adapter (Mona) is a vision-oriented parameter-efficient adapter that adapts pre-trained visual models by tuning only a few parameters. However, Mona statically aggregates responses from multiple scales, limiting its ability to accommodate sample-specific scale preferences and model confusion among visually similar mineral categories. To address this issue, we propose \textbf{RouteGraph-Mona}, a lightweight route-space regularization method built on Mona. Specifically, we replace Mona's static multi-scale aggregation with sample-adaptive routing. The resulting branch-selection behavior defines a compact routing space that captures each image's scale preferences. We then regularize the resulting routing signatures with class-wise route anchors and confusion-weighted margins. The route anchors encourage class-consistent routing patterns, while the margins promote greater separation between visually similar categories in the routing space. Experiments on three public mineral image datasets with two visual backbones show that RouteGraph-Mona consistently outperforms Mona in mean accuracy and remains competitive with representative fine-tuning methods and mineral image classification baselines.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jierui Li, Zhiyuan Qi, Hao Zhu, Yufan Liu, Jixian Liu, Shaojie Jiang, Jianda Wang, Yaqi Liu, Xiaotong Li, Wei Wang. 2026-09-02. RouteGraph-Mona: Confusion-Aware Routing Fine-Tuning for Mineral Image Classification. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02282

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A survey of AI-generated voices and their detection

The ability of artificial intelligence (AI) models to generate highly realistic human voices has advanced rapidly. These technologies power accessibility tools, virtual assistants and creative applications, but they also enable harmful uses, including impersonation, fraud and disinformation. Recent incidents of voice cloning scams targeting businesses and political leaders underscore the urgent need for robust safeguards. Unlike image and video deepfakes, the detection of synthetic voices poses unique challenges due to the complexity of phonetics, prosody and auditory perception. This survey offers a comprehensive overview of AI voice generation and detection methods, encompassing both the technical foundations and the latest state-of-the-art advances. This study also identifies key open challenges, benchmark resources and future directions to make this survey useful for future researchers.

cs.AI

When Saying No Makes Better Videos: Designing Dual Gatekeeping for Pedagogically Grounded AI Content Creation

To prevent the adoption of aesthetically polished but pedagogically flawed AI content, we study a video authoring pipeline featuring two layers of structured refusal. The first layer empowers educators to iteratively reshape AI scripts based on multimedia learning theory, while the second employs automated metrics to flag violations in instructional coherence and narrative-visual synchronization. While neither layer is exhaustive, their synergy ensures that principled resistance--the act of deferring AI output until it meets rigorous standards--becomes a catalyst for higher quality. Evaluation combining a study with 23 educators across 3 topics and automated metrics across 7 topics drawn from established science and philosophy curricula shows that both layers independently improve the same instructional dimensions, suggesting that thoughtful resistance and generative AI are not opposites but partners.

cs.AI

Measuring Similarity between Artistic and AI Generated Images using Siamese Neural Networks

AI-generated art has sparked debates around potential plagiarism, as these images may closely resemble existing artworks. This research quantifies the similarity between original pieces and AI-generated counterparts, particularly those produced by the Stable Diffusion XL Refiner 1.0. We use Siamese Networks with frozen CLIP encoders and cosine similarity optimized through triplet loss. A dataset of paired original and generated images was built using image-to-image generation and custom prompts, enriched with semantic descriptors and BLIP-2 captions. Prior studies report up to 81\% style replication and 90\% visual similarity. Our results show high discriminative performance: training accuracy reached 99.9\%, and the best model configuration achieved 99.4\% test accuracy with strong inter-class separation ($δμ$ = 0.677), demonstrating the effectiveness of our semantic-visual embeddings.

cs.CV