SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2609.05728

MedWER: A Reproducible, Model-Free Evaluation Protocol for Medical Speech Recognition

Abstract

Overall word error rate hides clinically critical errors: a transcript can be 95% correct and still swap one drug for another. The usual fix weights errors on medical entities, and almost always depends on an evaluation-time named-entity recognition (NER) model or cloud API, which makes the metric's denominator a versioned black box. We present MedWER, an evaluation protocol and open-source tool for medical ASR whose denominator is a fixed, license-clean term list: 19,373 drug, diagnosis, symptom, and injury-mechanism entries projected from public sources. The protocol couples a pinned text normalizer with a phrase-aware term-restricted WER, the MedWER, so the only versioned component is a normalizer dependency held at an exact release and checked against committed golden fixtures. Coverage is validated against an independent provincial drug-benefit file the list was not built from; the matching heuristic is calibrated against ground-truth entity spans. Baselines for Moonshine~base, Whisper~base.en, and MedASR on two open benchmarks are scored with the released tool and reported with 95% confidence intervals from resampled per-utterance scores.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Justin Behling. 2026-09-04. MedWER: A Reproducible, Model-Free Evaluation Protocol for Medical Speech Recognition. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05728

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

CyrillicQA: The Influence of Phonetically Encoded Secret Language on LLM Performance

Due to the selection of their training data, large language models (LLMs) perform best on standard-language inputs from languages using the Latin alphabet with large speaker populations, while disadvantaging other language varieties. Nevertheless, they can also be a versatile tool for preserving precisely such endangered languages. But do they also possess the necessary creativity and capacity for abstraction to decode phonetically encoded language the same way humans do?

cs.CL

Density Matrices for Metaphor Understanding

In physics, density matrices are used to represent mixed states, i.e. probabilistic mixtures of pure states. This concept has previously been used to model lexical ambiguity. In this paper, we consider metaphor as a type of lexical ambiguity, and examine whether metaphorical meaning can be effectively modelled using mixtures of word senses. We find that modelling metaphor is significantly more difficult than other kinds of lexical ambiguity, but that our best-performing density matrix method outperforms simple baselines as well as some neural language models.

cs.CL

Informational Antilocality and the Locality Bias in LLMs

We consider the ability of transformer-based language models (LLMs) to learn what we call k-antilocal languages, i.e., languages that have no mutual information across any span of $k$ contiguous symbols. We construct such languages with increasing $k$, finding that LLMs trained on them achieve comparable cross-entropy loss regardless of antilocality, but converge more slowly on more antilocal languages. Our findings support the idea that non-local dependencies are more difficult to learn, but the evidence for this bias comes from learning speed rather than learning success.

cs.CL