SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2609.06275

Riccati Stability Without Auxiliary Matrices

Abstract

In the 2004 collection \emph{Unsolved Problems in Mathematical Systems and Control Theory}, Erik Verriest posed the problem of characterizing Riccati stability ``without invoking additional matrices.'' We give such a characterization through a scalar invariant of the resolvent family. The invariant is defined by covariance balances using at most $n^2+1$ frequency--direction pairs. A finite-dimensional separation argument shows that this covariance radius equals the optimal common ellipsoidal norm of the resolvent family. Combined with the strict bounded real lemma, this yields a necessary and sufficient condition for Riccati stability involving only the Hurwitz property of the first matrix and a single scalar inequality. The invariant reduces to the ordinary spectral radius for one matrix, lies between the pointwise spectral-radius and unscaled small-gain levels of the resolvent family, and coincides with the operator-space spectral radius of Shalit and Shamovich for the natural resolvent function space.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jeffrey Humpherys. 2026-09-05. Riccati Stability Without Auxiliary Matrices. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06275

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A simple derivation of the Kalman filter

In this lecture note, we present a concise and self-contained derivation of the discrete-time Kalman filter equations that requires only a basic understanding of least squares estimation. The treatment is designed to minimize mathematical overhead while preserving both rigor and generality.

math.OC

Comment on "Event-Triggered Stabilization of Linear Time-Delay Systems via Halanay-Type Inequality"

This comment revisits Lemma 1 in [1], which plays a central role in the event-triggered stabilization analysis developed therein. We identify technical gaps in the proof of the lemma and provide a corrected argument. In particular, careful treatment of the exponentially decaying term shows that its decay rate must be retained in the resulting convergence estimate. The statement of the original lemma, with the exponential decay rate determined by the minimum of the characteristic decay rate and the decay rate of this term, remains valid.

math.OC